50 Lessons

A Marriaging Curriculum

Lesson #1

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

It’s astonishing how we bring our best to our careers and our kids and even our hobbies, but frequently lack imagination and the drive to invest in our marriages.

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

Our lack of imagination and investment is the primary reason the state of marriage is so tenuous. It’s not the institutions’ fault. It has careless users.

 

 

“The knack of our species lies in our capacity to transmit our accumulated knowledge down the generations. The slowest among us can, in a few hours, pick up ideas that it took a few rare geniuses a lifetime to acquire.

Yet what is distinctive is just how selective we are about the topics we deem it possible to educate ourselves in. Our energies are overwhelmingly directed toward material, scientific, and technical subjects and away from psychological and emotional ones. Much anxiety surrounds the question of how good the next generation will be at math; very little around their abilities at marriage or kindness. We devote inordinate hours to learning about tectonic plates and cloud formations, and relatively few fathoming shame and rage.

 

The assumption is that emotional insight might be either unnecessary or in essence unteachable, lying beyond reason or method, an unreproducible phenomenon best abandoned to individual instinct and intuition. We are left to find our own path around our unfeasibly complicated minds — a move as striking (and as wise) as suggesting that each generation should rediscover the laws of physics by themselves.” 

We love this quote and the work of Alain de Botton as he is someone who cuts through to the absurdity of how we live, spending ridiculous amounts of money and time on all kinds of trivial things but investing so little in the one thing that most shapes our lives- our marriages and our emotional and mental health that undergirds this central relationship.

We own a wedding venue and have the privilege of witnessing the celebrations that inaugurate marriages, but it’s the stuff that enables marriages to thrive that dominates our thoughts. Over 20 years into our own marriage and experiencing various mid-life questions ourselves, we have done a lot of soul searching and combing through the literature on relationships. What we have learned more than anything else is that we need to keep learning. There is so much room for growth. And while learning does take effort, the ROI on this work is priceless.

 

The motivating force behind this content was personal. We want to have the best marriage possible. After so much reading and discussion, we started not only consolidating the information but organizing the various themes and dynamic processes in a particular order, as in our opinion there are pre-requisites to the formation of a healthy relationship.

 

 

The following graphic illustrates the 5 core units this curriculum is divided into. The first involves some attempts at self-knowledge through diagnostic tools and surveys. The second furthers this work by spending significant time unpacking the hidden rooms in our hearts. Developing an interior life, or an interior awareness, is not for the faint of heart, but relationships flourish when we bring greater self-awareness into them. With increased self-understanding we can better negotiate our marriage relationship, moving us into the third unit—The solutions generator. Here we look at resources to help us not only share our deepest desires, but listen to our partner share theirs and discovers ways to love each other through respect and compromise. Good relationships don’t run away from the conflict that is inevitable whenever two different beings enter a room, they learn healthy and loving ways to negotiate the conflict. The fourth unit is devoted to building habits that ensure you communicate well with your partner. This is very much an Atomic Habits applied to marriage approach, where we echo James Clear by insisting that just having good goals and intentions will never be enough. We fall to the level of our systems. As a couple, you need to build new and better systems that reflect where you want to go. Last, it takes a village to nurture the best of marriages, and so we talk about what it means for you and your partner to be truly connected to a supportive community.

 

Marriages evolve because life is never static. You grow and change. So does your partner. These units are presented in a circular graphic to reflect the fact the marriaging well is a never ending process. The systems you put in place last year may need to be updated. Your partner’s hopes and dreams will change course, perhaps only a little, or perhaps a lot. Healthy marriages are built not just on kind communication, but consistent communication. Together, you course correct along life’s way.

 

 

/ the exercise /

 

Go back over your bank statements and figure out how much money you spent this last month (or year, if you are an ambitious numbers type) on dating your spouse or educating yourself to be a better partner (relational books, seminars, therapy, etc).

Take some time to compare the number you get with the amount of money you spend on other pursuits: sports activities, gaming, streaming services, etc…

 

Next, calculate the time you spend intentionally enjoying your partner (date nights, outings you both are excited for, unnecessary activities you engage in together because they bring you joy, blocks of time you set aside for quality conversation, etc). How does this stack up against the amount of time you spend directly engaging your children, or pursuing extra-curricular hobbies, or over-time at work?

 

Lesson #2.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Therapists won’t save your marriage.*

Financial advisors won’t make you wealthy.

A coach won’t make you healthy.

 

At the end of the day, you have to make the choice. 

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

*Of course therapists can be an amazing help, a needed intervention and guiding light to recovery for a marriage on the rocks, or a resource to keep a marriage going strong. The point here is not to dismiss our need for help. In fact, in the content that follows we are going to make an argument that seems to contradict the quote above and stress our desperate need for community, for others to step in and help make us whole.

 

Life is comprised of paradox. The sooner we can learn to hold together truths that seem to be in conflict and grant that these opposing ideas each have merit, the sooner we will be on our way to being a clear thinker. But for today, let us start with this revolutionary truth- we have what is called agency. My first reading of Confucius came from The Unsettling of America, where Wendell Berry quoted him, “…wanting good government in their states, they first established order in their own families; wanting order in the home, they first disciplined themselves…”

 

So it really does come down to this: do you want to invest in your marriage? Are you willing to do whatever it takes?

 

 

/ the exercise /

Your assignment is take this last question seriously. To ask yourself: do I want to invest in my marriage, really?  Journal your thoughts.

Lesson #3.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

“The most difficult thing in life is to know yourself.”- Thales

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

It’s common knowledge that our self-knowledge is pretty abysmal. Nevertheless it is common practice to go through life not thinking much about this and to go around acting as if we were in the know. Maybe this is because of something Aldous Huxley observed, “If most of us remain ignorant of ourselves, it is because self-knowledge is painful and we prefer the pleasures of illusion.”

 

But let’s say we really do want to get to know ourselves. How does one go about gaining honest self-knowledge? Carl Jung suggested that “Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves.” John Calvin opened his famous Institutes of the Christian Religion by stating: 1. Without knowledge of self there is no knowledge of God. 2. Without knowledge of God there is no knowledge of self.  Then he proceeded to detail how these knowledges were connected.

 

Admittedly our approach is under the persuasion that human’s gain their deepest insights into themselves when they work that out in relation to the Creator.  At times in this curriculum we will offer an overtly “Christian” (for lack of a better word) take on the subject being discussed, but the majority of this content is drawn from non-Christian writers and thinkers.  This is not because we don’t value Christian thinkers on these subjects, but because we believe so much of this content has a universal appeal and can be presented in as inclusive a way as possible. We comfortably acknowledge that many of the insights and ideas which we believe ultimately trace back to or find their fulfillment in God have been thoughtfully articulated by people who don’t connect those dots.  So we invite everyone reading this to embrace what you feel comfortable embracing and pass over that which you can’t ascribe to.

 

 

 

 

/ the exercise /

 

My Heart’s Desires Quiz

 

1.    The top three things I do when I have free time include:

·       

·       

·       

 

2.    Who do I most seek to please?

 

3.    What do I fantasize about  when I have nothing else on my mind?

 

 

4.    Outside of life’s necessities, I spend more money on the following (than on anything else): __________.

 

5.    What rules me? (Or, Who rules me?)

 

 

6.    What is it, if I were to gain it, would make my life near complete?

 

 

7.    More than anything else, I feel like a worthwhile person because of … ________.

 

8.    What are the top three things I fear?

 

 

9.    If my partner were asked to list my 5 most intense passions, I’m guessing they would say:

·       

·       

·       

·       

·       

 

10. I derive the most joy from: ___________________________________________.

 

Lesson #4.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

 

“By being yourself you put something wonderful in the world that was not there before.” – Edwin Elliott

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

“Over time, we learn to equate all of who we are with the ego, creating a kind of false self or persona. We each come into this world as a unique and authentic self. As dependent children, however, we adopt survival strategies to help us adapt to our environment. We find ingenious ways to navigate through life using coping strategies to protect ourselves as small beings in a big world. These unconscious strategies determine to which of the nine personality types we belong. But “you” and “your personality” are not the same thing.” -Beatrice Chestnut, from The Enneagram Guide to Waking Up

 

 

 

/ the  exercise /

 

Take an enneagram quiz on-line.

 

Read The Enneagram Guide to Waking Up by Beatrice Chestnut

Extra credit: The Enneagram in Marriage by Christa Hardin

 

Lesson #5.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

The way to better understanding and loving others is to better understand yourself, and the way to better understand yourself is to understand those around you.

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

We are walking contradictions. We don’t want to be lonely but we don’t want to be smothered. We want to be fully seen, understood, and loved, but we are at the same time terrified what others would think if they knew us for who we really are. But the irony is that we will never even fully understand ourselves. So logically it is absurd to think that we could ever find that perfect relationship where someone else fully understood us. We, all of us humans, are mysteries.

 

And herein lies the difficulty. Despite the fact that as humans we are so difficult to understand and love, we yearn for it, and no doubt at times experience some gracious measure of it.

 

The question then becomes, how? And, are there ways to experience more love and understanding?

 

Yes, but the answer lies within a paradox or a causality dilemma: The way to better understanding and loving others is to better understand yourself, and the way to better understand yourself is to understand those around you.

 

 

/ the  exercise /

 

Write down some of the ways you are a walking contradiction. What are some beliefs that you hold on to that you regularly fail to practice or (better yet) some beliefs you carry that contradict other things you believe in.

 

 

 

Lesson #6.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

“I am who I am because of who we are.” – Ubuntu

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

There is an African concept, Ubuntu, that we will use as the entry point for developing greater self-understanding. Ubuntu means “I am who I am because of who we are.” It captures the deep wisdom that none of us are islands. No one is self-made. Even our loneliness points to the nature of our relationships within community. Perhaps it evidences the painful lack of friendships or a society that structures our existences through isolating us and directing us toward market goals. Like traditional societies across the globe and the Africans who developed this particular articulation, we believe Ubuntu is not just a, but the primary lens to use when seeking to understand ourselves and our marriage relationships.  It is totally naïve and counterproductive to try an uncover your inner life and motives and personality as if you live in a vacuum. No matter how introverted or unique you think you are, you are who you are in large part because of who you have been and are today surrounded by.

 

 

 

/ the  exercise /

 

Name the 5 people who you believe have influenced you most.

            1.

            2.

            3.

            4.

            5.

 

Lesson #7.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Who are we? Answer #1 = members of a family.

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

A family is more than the sum of its parts. There are so many psychological dynamics going on in a family that it is difficult to either enumerate or pinpoint which dynamics to focus on. It may be helpful to start by looking for multigenerational patterns and then to zoom into your immediate family unit.

 

 

/ the  exercise /

 

 (warning- this can take years, but perhaps start with giving it an hour)

·      What has been passed down or transmitted?

·      What would you deem as healthy and what would you call unhealthy?

·      Has there been significant parental projection where the hopes or fears or habits of parents are imposed upon the next generation?

·      How have conflicts been resolved? 

·      Are there conflicts that were never resolved?

·      How have conflicts been avoided?

·      How have different members of the family gone about resolving or avoiding conflicts?

·      Where has there been positive intimacy?

·      Where has there been emotional detachment or cutoff?

·      Has birth order and parental expectations shaped sibling relationships, individual aspirations or behavior?

·      How is any relationship between two of the family members augmented with the introduction of a particular third?

·      Have family members achieved a healthy level of differentiation as they matured? Do you have a working idea for what you would say is a good level of differentiation?

 

Lesson #8.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Attachment theory primer

 

 

/ unpacked /

/ the  exercise /

 

Regarding attachment theory, if you want to wade deep in its waters, we’d recommend Attachment Theory in Practice by Susan Johnson

 

Related to attachment theory is the experience of trauma. There has been an awakening to the impact of what is termed “trauma” on our lives, and there are a whole lot of resources these days unpacking this. A few that we’ve read include:

 

The Body Keeps Score, by Bessel Van Der Kolk

My Grandmother’s Hands, by Resmaa Menakem

The Pain We Carry, by Natalie Gutierrez

Lesson #9.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Who are we? Answer #2 = members of a culture.

 

Your family exists in a community which exists in a culture which exists in a society.

 

/ unpacked /

/ the  exercise /

 

Communities, cultures, and societies have written and unwritten rules. Can you name the dominant norms of the culture you were born into?

 

How are these norms different from other cultures in the world and from cultures of previous generations?  Your ability to offer some answers to this question is an indication of the size of the bubble you have lived in. There is nothing wrong with existing in a small bubble, but if you have not considered what it would be like to live in a different bubble, the bubble you are in may not be the one that aligns with what you most believe in.

 

Lesson #10.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

A Friendship Recession

Our current cultural moment: a case study

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

In western societies, and maybe nowhere more so than in the United States, we live in a culture that is described as hyper-individualistic. What this means is that relative to other societies throughout history and the present day world, our society is structured such that individuals or individual (nuclear) family units do most of life independently from extended family and friends. We don’t live with parents and rarely take them in when they get old. We don’t have the same friends or neighbors over sharing dinner with us five times a week. We don’t worship and work with the same folks. Our lives are compartmentalized. Most of our friendships are now compartmentalized- we have the friends who do we sports with or game with, friends we keep up with only through social media, and perhaps a few friends for whom we are invited to their birthday parties. There still may be a group of people we identify as core or people who we are relationally close to, our “best friends”. But whereas in previous generations we relied heavily on these people in our day to day activities, now we can and do mostly get by without them and their role has faded to the margins of life.

 

This is a culture. Someone has said that we are experiencing a “friendship recession.” This is a societal wide norm. What that means is that even if you are fed up and lonely and want to cultivate the kind of friendship where every evening you hang out, have dinner, play a game, share a drink- the odds are that you won’t be able to find such a friend to reciprocate. Almost everybody is running on the treadmill and has bought into the idea that we do this by ourselves. All around us we hear preached and see displayed a notion of the American Dream that says success is advancing to the bigger house and nicer car. Success is a job with greater status, an honorary degree, or a career with meaning- it’s your contribution or your trophy, but almost never is it your connection with others. That happens in your free time. But since we are all so tired at trying to juggle life’s demands alone, we end up taking the expedient route to immediate gratification which is turning off our brains to watch Netflix and eat pre-made food.

 

We have prioritized all these individualistic pursuits such that we have left little room for developing and maintaining and enjoying friendships. But worse, we aren’t even stopping to ask whether this all is worth it. It would be one thing if we thought all this through and decided that after looking at the pros and cons of individual achievement versus friendship, yes, I willingly reject friendship to make room to climb higher on the American Dream ladder. But very few of us are making that choice. That choice has been made for us. Our culture is structured in such a way, is built on certain principles, esteems certain goals, and reinforces these through innumerable outlets such that almost no one is raising the question- Why? Why have we devalued friendship?

 

I don’t think it is because we dislike the idea of friends. I don’t think it is because of a lack of desire for friends. And it certainly isn’t because we have a super abundance of friends. Statistically, loneliness has been on the rise.  And when people hear headlines claiming that “the impact of lacking social connection on reducing life span is equal to the risk of smoking 15 cigarettes a day” (Vivek Murthy, Together, page 13) no one is shaking their head in disbelief.

 

We’ve devalued friendship vis a vis our over-valuation of career, mobility, bigger homes, nicer cars, and kid’s sports. All these pursuits have our calendars spilling over the brim. We’ve substituted higher quantities of virtual friends for higher quality real friends. The convenience of virtual friends can’t be beaten. You can check in on them while waiting in line at the grocery store or doctor’s office. No commute. A simple swipe. The one bummer is that for most of us these virtual friendships aren’t fixing our loneliness.

 

Good friends are more than amicable colleagues or those you just so happen to have grown up around or cross paths with today. Friendship derives from a shared interest and joy. There are things in life that we appreciate and value, and when someone comes along who looks at the same things we do and understands why we feel the way we do, a kind of bond is formed. We don’t have to resonate with a friend on everything, but in some important areas of life a friend’s presence and passion serves to amplify our own.  We don’t technically need friends, but life is exponentially richer with them.

 

The goal then should be to start by identifying what it is that we are after. What do we find beautiful and good? What do we find life-giving, up-lifting, sustaining? And once we’ve got some ideas around these things, our second goal should be to find others, even just a few others will do,  who share some of that vision and want to spend time journeying towards it with you.

 

Undoubtably a partner or spouse should be one such person. But Mia Birdsong joins a chorus of others when she warns us against reducing our circle of friends to a sole person, our spouse. “….your relationship with a spouse or romantic partner is meant to be the most important one you have. The insular nuclear family, around which our personal life is supposed to orbit, is built from matrimony. It’s a reinforcing of the independent individual, recast as the independent couple. Spouses are meant to fulfill a wide range of roles in our lives—lover, best friend, caretaker, housemate, confidant, coparent,    

co-finance and household manager, activity and travel buddy. That is an impossibly high bar for two people to meet for each other… We tend to isolate some when we fall in love. That isolation means that people in couples often bear the brunt of each other’s stress and anger and pain. This dynamic is especially true for straight couples. Because of the socialization men get, they are less likely than women to develop emotionally intimate relationships outside their romantic/sexual relationships. This means that their female partners are doing a tremendous amount of emotional labor that isn’t reciprocated.” (How We Show Up. Page 47) Esther Perel shared a similar concern when she wrote “today, we turn to one person to provide what an entire village once did: a sense of grounding, meaning and continuity.” (Mating in Captivity, xiv). 

 

We need a plurality of friends to share our diversity of passions with. One person may be a great match, but all of us are too complex and too needy for a single person to satisfy our desire to be understood and to look out at the world with a shared sense of awe. There may be cases where friendships clearly function to replace or displace a spouse, but a more frequent problem in modern individualistic cultures is an overall lack of vitality due to the fact that one has too few friends to draw out and stimulate their full personhood. We need to leverage a healthy collection of friends, in other words, to make us healthy individuals which in turn makes us healthier partners. Outside friendships can and should strengthen marriages. Again, Mia Birdsong: “while part of what I’m working toward is flattening the relationship hierarchy, I’m also clear that my friendships are part of what keep my marriage working. I get a range of love, affirmation, attention, inspiration, perspective, and engagement that isn’t dependent on my husband or the state of our relationship.” (How We Show Up, 75)

 

Men and women alike benefit from friends.  A deep soul friend, what the Irish termed anam cara, or what Anne of Green Gables called a kindred spirit or bosom friend, approaches what we have been talking about. But even more aunties and compadres would be a step in the right direction.

 

 

 

/ the  exercise /

 

Other than your spouse, list the three people who you feel are your closest friends.

1.

2.

3.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson #11.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

“One thing he’s learned from his studies is that culture and traditions affect the quality of loneliness and connectedness by shaping our social expectations. Loneliness, Ami told me, occurs when our social experience fails to meet our social expectations.” (Together, Murthy)

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

As we attempt to better understand ourselves we are making the claim that who we are is in no small measure the product of our community, or of the relationships, however good or bad, we have experienced up to this point in our lives. It can be argued that, ontologically speaking, humans are most human by way of their interconnectedness to each other. You are you and I am me vis a vis the relationships that have surrounded me.

 

The social sciences are far from being irrefutable, but most people recognize their value being derived from the fact that they can recognize and catalog human behavior in empirical ways, providing us with insights into why we behave the way we do.

 

This can be extremely helpful, and this curriculum is largely the compilation of insights from numerous thinkers distilled and applied toward marital health. But backing up for a moment, before we try to apply techniques for behavior modification upon ourselves, our first priority is to know ourselves well enough to know if we want to change ourselves and if so, how do we want to change? In what direction do we want to change?

 

If we are making the claim that our relationships meet fundamental human needs then how do we measure the quality of our relationships? How do we know what we need out of relationships? Is there a kind of universal metric for mental and relational health? The field of psychology seems to suggest that we must answer this last question with a yes and a no at the same time.

 

A yes because across most of time and in most geographies we have taken certain behaviors as signs of a lack of mental, relational, and emotional health and others as a signs of their presence. But we simultaneous must provide a no because arguably most behaviors exist in this large gray area in between the more obvious signs of health and unhealth. In part this is due to the fact that there is tremendous diversity in our humanity. Many of the things we crave as individuals are not shared by others or at least not in the same way or to the same degree, and these are things that often contribute to our behavior. This makes it very hard to diagnosis health by tracing back from behaviors.

 

We have already said that we can’t expect to fully know ourselves or to diagnosis ourselves with total accuracy due to the complexity of our biology and of the unquantifiable diversity in our upbringings. But in no way are we saying that we can’t grow in self-awareness and self-understanding, and that this growth is not desirable. What we are advocating for here is a kind of back and forth dialogue. You can start with your experience or feelings and then read the literature and theories attempting explanations, or you can start by reading the science and then seeing how your feelings fit or don’t fit.

 

Take our piece on a friendship recession from the previous lesson. While we resolutely believe everyone benefits from friendships, we are not saying everyone needs a certain number of friends or that everyone needs to spend x number of hours per week with friends. Extroverts and introverts may have deeply divergent needs. The point is to recognize the universal truth behind this principle and then to apply it carefully with the appropriate nuance each individual case warrants.

 

 

/ the  exercise /

 

Journal.

How often do I feel lonely? Do I crave more friends? Deeper friendships? Both?

Or do I feel like I have just the right number of friends in my life?

If I could change anything about my friendships, it would be….

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson #12.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

What communities do I belong to and how connected am I?

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

To unpack this question we invite you to draw a web map of the communities you belong to. Think of the different groups of people you regularly interact with. Your family. Your spouse’s family. Work colleagues. Neighbors. Sports team parents. Old high school friends. Old college roommates. A faith community. A non-profit you volunteer at. Friends from a different state or country.

 

If some people fit into multiple groups, see if you can demonstrate that visually on your web map by overlapping circles, drawing connecting lines, or maybe underlining these names multiple times.

 

 

/ the exercise /

 

Ask yourself two questions about these relationships:

How vulnerable am I with this person (meaning, how much do I open up and share and how vulnerable are they with me)?

 

AND

 

How often do I get together with this person?

 

The most powerful relationships have both intimacy (read: vulnerability) AND consistency (read: high frequency, regular time spent together).  

Both are needed.

 

 

 

Lesson #13.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Metacognition

“What are the core features of agency?” Agency is, fundamentally, the ability to slow things down, focus, and size up your current situation and make good decisions. This comes from developing a capacity to pause, reflect, and deeply consider where you find yourself. In its highest form, agency allows you to step outside of yourself and assess the quality of your own thinking and feelings, a concept that psychologists call metacognition. This is all another way of saying that agency allows you to see your life accurately and envision it as it could be-and plot the steps to get there. Note some things that agency is not about: “productivity” or “high performance”(though it does bolster both). (The Power of Agency by Paul Napper and Anthony Rao).

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

We will always be in some ways strangers to ourselves. Our knowledge is incomplete. The mind remains an amazing mystery to even the best neuroscientists. But while we live with incomplete cognition one thing we do know is that developing, training, and honing our ability to think about our thinking does allow us to move through life with more intentionality, with more accuracy towards the destination we seek. Imagine fumbling through a house in pitch black darkness. You still have tactile abilities and are able to move with some success, but it usually proves quite difficult. Metacognition is like adding a night light in the corner, something that provides just enough light to enhance your night journey.

 

Understanding your mind helps you direct it better. When we learn to focus in and work on knowing what we know and how we know it, we increase our ability to realize what we don’t know. Being aware of what we don’t know is often times the turning point in our quest to live better lives. We realize we need to learn and grow.

Thinking strategically about our thoughts, beliefs, rationales, and especially about how we so often behave not in accordance with these beliefs but out of emotional habits developed in childhood is a starting point for figuring out how to act strategically to change the course of our lives.

 

 

/ the exercise /

 

Metacognition, this ability to think about our thinking, to be aware, reflect and even control what is going on inside our brains is one of the most important tools in our toolkit to repair self-understanding and marital relationships. Take some to time reflect on how well you engage in metacognition. I encourage you to describe your metacognition in words written or verbal.

 

There is no one way to develop metacognition. Some people set aside time to meditate. Others sense that their minds are too distracted or on overload, and implement an information diet. Many people gain insight into their thinking through journaling or writing. Some engage counselors. Figure out what works for you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson #14.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Metaemotion

Put simply, metaemotion is an emotion we experience in response to our prior emotions.

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

We naturally appraise the situations we find ourselves in all day long, and these appraisals elicit primary emotions, but as humans we have the amazing ability to then appraise those primary emotions, and that secondary appraisal can generate a meta-emotion, an emotional response to our original emotion.

 

Awareness of meta-emotions aids in our ability to reflect on the desirability of the emotions we’ve experienced and contemplate strategies to mitigate or enhance our experience of these emotions by putting ourselves in the situations where these emotions are triggered. Or-just as important-removing ourselves from the situations where these emotions are triggered.

 

As we’ll repeat throughout this curriculum, the value of subtraction in life cannot be overstated. So often we’ll make the greatest strides towards our personal goals when we learn the art of removing things from our lives.

 

There might be no greater argument for this than the body of evidence and work of Tristan Harris. Tristan has quoted E. O. Wilson saying, “the fundamental problem for humanity is that we have paleolithic emotions and brains (easily hack-able), medieval institutions (governments not really good at seeing the latest tech), and god-like technology.” Tristan then asks how do we wield the power of God without the love, wisdom, and prudence of God? And the reality we find ourselves immersed in everyday is that big tech is engaged in the race to the bottom of our brain stems, using business models predicated on how to get and keep our attention at all costs. The point being that it is no surprise that companies with close to a trillion dollars can point the exponential power of AI at your brain and keep you scrolling all day. Emotional addictions drive profit.

 

An example of using metaemotion might be recognizing the feelings you have about the emotions you experience when scrolling through your feed and deciding if those are emotions you really want to nurture. If not, and if you recognize the role social media and technological devices are playing in creating your emotional state, you have the power to eliminate or at least greatly restrict your engagement with these forces.

Metaemotion may be a more difficult concept to get that metacognition. This is likely because emotions arise and hide, multiple and divide, persist and abide in subterranean regions. A lot of our emotional energy is almost subconscious, and we find ourselves confused at this tangle of multiple emotions that we are either feeling simultaneously or bouncing back and forth between. Learn to cultivate the space necessary to feel fully and detect the origins of your emotions…it will be your greatest superpower.  

 

 

/ the exercise /

 

Assignment: Read Brene Brown’s Atlas of the Heart

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson #15.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Desire is a thing of the heart and the imagination. It is itself a pleasure imagined, but can double as an actualized prison if the imagination cannot be exited at will. We can experience desire as gift or prison, and it regularly is the driver of motivation.

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

For simplicity’s sake, let’s point out 2 common and conflicting approaches to the role of desire in life. The first one is pretty ubiquitous in modern western culture. It’s repackaged in a thousand forms in Disney movies to Reddit articles.  It is the view that at the center of human identity is the presence of core desires, desires based on our core needs, and pursuing these desires is the pathway to our authentic selves and happiness. Unless pathological or unless they lead to the harm of others, this approach is a wholesale endorsement of human desire. It is no surprise that our culture has embraced this understanding, it fits nicely within a consumer culture. Thomas Hobbes articulated something very near to this when he stated that “the fundamental motivation of all human action is the desire for pleasure.”

 

The second approach is a kind of binary position to the first, there is no single agreed upon title, but for the sake of categorizing, let’s call it the Rational-Buddhist approach. This approach is summarized best by Naval Ravikant when he said, “Desire is a contract you make with yourself to be unhappy until you get what you want.” A lot of modern rational stoic types lean into Buddhism’s recognition that behind our suffering lies desire.  Other philosophers have said as much in different terms, like Baruch Spinoza, who saw natural desires as a form of bondage. The point isn’t hard to grasp, the very act of desiring heightens the experience of pain or can distract the person from other tasks in the present.   

 

  

/ the exercise /

 

But for you and your partner, we’d like you to consider the following definition of desire:

Desire is a thing of the heart and the imagination. It is itself a pleasure imagined, but can double as an actualized prison if the imagination cannot be exited at will. We can experience desire as gift or prison, and it regularly is the driver of motivation.

 

Under this view, desire is not the entirety of our identity nor should it necessarily be the driver, but it is undeniably a key part of being human and we can do much to cultivate or curb it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson #16.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Most of us do not even know what we want.

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

Do you know what you want?

Sometimes what we want most evolves. We change. We grow.

 

 

Read this on-line article by David Powlison: “Idols of the Heart and Vanity Fair

 

 

 

/ the exercise /

 

Journal, share, contemplate what it is that you most want… in life and in marriage.

 

Then challenge yourself to take this a step further. Are there root desires underneath the visible desires you have named?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson #17.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Esther Perel argues that humans have two opposing needs- the need for stable, secure and selfless love found within commitment and the need for eros, a longing for exploration, change, freedom, and passion. These desires simply cannot be reconciled in a given moment, but she proposes we can learn to float back and forth between them in a committed relationship buttressed by clear communication and a good measure of self-awareness.

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

In her book Mating in Captivity, Perel writes,  “…the tension between security and adventure is a paradox to manage, not a problem to solve. It is a puzzle. “Can you hold the awareness of each polarity? You need each at different times, but you can’t have both at the same time. Can you accept that? It’s not an either-or situation, but one where you get the benefits of each and also recognize the limits of each. It’s an ebb and flow.” Love and desire are two rhythmic yet clashing forces that are always in a state of flux and always looking for the balance point.”  It is her view that there are polarities that come “as sets of interdependent opposites that belong to the same whole—you can’t choose one over the other; the system needs both to survive.”

 

But it is crucial to note that not every intimate relationship values sexual eros to the same degree. Many couples come together really wanting a lifelong friend and are content in a relationship that is very asexual. There is no right or wrong here. The goal for all couples should be self-understanding, respect for the partner’s wishes, and clear communication.

 

 

/ the exercise /

 

In your marriage relationship, have you been able to float back and forth between the stable state of selfless love and a measure of novelty driven by desire?

 

Assignment: Read Mating in Captivity, by Esther Perel

 

 

Lesson #18.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Sex gets boring because you are boring.

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

For many people the need for emotional intimacy and security takes precedence over the need for passion and adventure but these same people go on living in a kind of sulking state, wishing they could have both, but assuming that they are confronted with an either-or situation. I recall a Robin Williams quip-

“You could talk about same-sex marriage, but people who have been married (say) 'It's the same sex all the time.'”

 

The primary reason for this “same sex” that becomes routine, unromantic, uncharged, and as a result, often times less frequent, is because we (as a society) have cultivated a myopic narrative of passion. We’ve fallen for the Romantic ideology that passion is something that we don’t have to work at, that it is a state we fall into. We have reduced love and passion to infatuation. In reality, that is one stage of passion. The first stage. The easiest stage. It is easiest because the lover is new and mysterious to us. It is like arriving in a foreign country and there is a thrill to having lost your bearings. Your senses are heightened. You are learning quickly and growing by leaps and bounds. You are on the incline of the bell curve. But eventually it will plateau. Unfortunately, so much of the modern narrative suggests that at this point you have only one of two choices: grunt it out, hunker down and accept a marriage with little passion, or be like the traveler who constantly visits new countries, getting a dose of that high upon arrival but forfeiting any chance for a secure and stable life partner.

 

However, one of the goals of this curriculum is to advocate and explore what a stage two and three and four of passion could like. The key to stage two and beyond of passion is realizing that you must access your well of imagination and develop and apply it in new ways over the years. Sex gets boring because you get boring. You fail to see the beauty in your partner, you fail to spend time lusting after it, you fail to create a climate and context to explore, you wrongly assume you fully know each other… and most often you fail in all these things because you haven’t prioritized this work.  

 

 

/ the exercise /

 

We will discuss strategies for successfully alternating between intimacy and passion in later lessons. But for today the invitation is to spend time in honest reflection on your own hardwiring and that of your spouse.  Are you the type who craves stability, emotional intimacy, and tenderness more, or the type who really wants more adventure, novelty and mystery? Or put better: Imagine both of these needs on a continuum of 0% to 100%, with a 100% meaning that this is a need you strongly sense virtually all of the time. You may want both of these to an equally high degree.

 

After you spend some time determining how you are wired, the next question is: what are you doing to meet each of these needs (or what are you not doing)?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson #19.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

“The unexamined life is one not worth living.” -Socrates

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

 “Life can only be understood by looking backward, but it must be lived looking forward.”  - Soren Kieregaard

 

 

 

/ the exercise /

 

Journal.

What do you see when you look back over your life? What do you think others see?

What do you want to see in your future?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson #20.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

In the end we find that our greatest joy is experienced in this posture where we are largely absorbed in something bigger than or outside of ourselves.

 

(Or, in the words of Anne Lamott: “To be engrossed by something outside ourselves is a powerful antidote for the rational mind, the mind that so frequently has its head up its own ass—seeing things in such a narrow way  and darkly narcissistic way that it presents a colo-rectal theology, offering hope to no one.” -Bird by Bird: Some instructions on Writing and Life)

 

/ unpacked /

 

Up to this point we have been looking inside of ourselves and looking backward. Marriaging well involves knowing ourselves as best we can.

 

When we nurture greater self-awareness we are better able not only to articulate our own needs and thereby increase the likelihood of them being met, but we also open ourselves up to the potential for greater human connection. There is no short cut here. This is called interior work. Work. Not rest. Not play. Work.

 

We can’t shirk it off. Your mom can’t do it for you. You need to be a midwife to yourself. You need to birth the self you want to see. It starts with us knowing our context and how it has formed our heart’s desires, then we decide which ones to challenge, which ones to accept, and which to promote. It is a process some have called the “good restlessness.” We examine our thoughts and our emotions and the thoughts behind our thoughts and the emotions behind our emotions. But we should never get stuck here.

 

To get stuck here would be a terrible mistake.

 

At some point, the examination needs to silence, and we are invited to live forward into a paradox- a life of both looking inward and looking away. A life of examination and neglect. The examined life inevitably leads to a more intentional neglect.

 

The examined life will slowly reveal what it is that matters to us, and we learn that in the cacophony, the universe of near infinite possibilities, we -being finite in countless ways- are only able to desire a few things well, and the rest we must let flow around us. The rest has to be consigned to neglect. (The alternative is going through life always feeling empty or like we are missing out.)

 

We are neglecting all the time, whether we like it or realize it or not. And the fact of the matter is that it is usually easier to identify that which we should neglect or eliminate than the good we should pursue. So active neglect may be the safest, most efficient path to a better life. The point here is twofold: (a) neglect or looking away is essential and without it we will fall into overwhelm, frustration, perfectionism, irritability, control issues, etc; (b) we just want to learn to neglect the right things. Through the examined life we learn to cultivate a via negativa, a practiced acceptance. This is different than complacency or apathy or indifference. Rather, this state of being is a fusion of joy-filled resignation.

 

One does not despair. One continues on but with a new posture, as an improver who has nothing to prove, someone who enjoys the pursuit but can step away at any time. Someone who fully relishes the gift of desire, but with no dependency.

 

Another way to frame this is to say that this neglect is the very intentional placement of constraints on yourself. You come to know yourself better so you can better direct yourself. For instance, after one becomes better at looking inside, at doing the interior work, the irony is that this interior work hopefully leads to an intentional movement outside of oneself.

 

Most of us come to realize that in the end we want to think of ourselves less often. At some point we begin to see that being over-analytic and self-absorbed is miserable, and we’d rather be aware but have our awareness in the background and our focus on other human beings, or on the work we have chosen, the art we are creating. In the end we find that our greatest joy is experienced in this posture where we are largely absorbed in something bigger than or outside of ourselves.

 

 

/ the exercise /

 

“Living forward” into the paradox discussed requires intentionality.

 

Take some time here to identify what you are living for. What are your deepest held beliefs, values, desires, pursuits,  and along with that, ask yourself, who do I value?

 

Develop 3 exercises of the imagination to encourage your desires to flow towards what you want to live for.

 

Practice intentional neglect. Look away. List the things, pursuits, desires, activities, behaviors, (even the) people, to be subtracted from your life. These are the things and people who do not fit in with what you are living towards, the things or people who pull you away from this.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transitioning into the third movement: Solutions Generator

 

Lesson #21.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Have you come to the place where you are aware of how weird you are and how difficult you are to be around?

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

Name the ways you are not easy to be around, the areas where you remain stubborn, weak, imperfect, or, as Alain de Botton likes to say, “a bit crazy.”

 

Everyone gives lip service to the idea that no one is perfect, but very few people actually take this to its logical conclusion, which is that love has to be something that offers sympathy to not only ourselves for our weaknesses, but to others for theirs.

 

Usually the difficulty in a relationship is not that we are too down on ourselves, or too critical of our behavior. Almost always the problem is that we are quick to see the ways in which our spouse doesn’t meet the expectations we have for him or her, but very slow to acknowledge how disinclined we have been to change for the better.

 

 

/ the exercise /

Share some of your craziness. List some of your idiosyncrasies. Are you aware of any gross habits? Any annoying behavior? Better yet, for the courageous out there, enumerate some of the ways you are hypocritical.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson #22.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Have you made peace with the fact that your spouse not only can’t, but shouldn’t be expected to live up to all your expectations?

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

You will never find the right person. No one will ever fully understand you. Nor you them. The grass looks greener over there only because you are not seeing it up close or you don’t see it in the off season.

 

 

/ the exercise /

Do you practice a kind of permanent perennial grace to your spouse? Some theologians talk about the need to have a “low anthropology” (David Zahl), an approach to others that assumes we are all a bit like selfish children and we should handle each other with the same patience we usually extend to a toddler.

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson #23.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

It is an ironic surprise that the key to a healthy marriage lies in a conflict.

 

/ unpacked /

  

Not so much a conflict between partners. But conflicting truths that must be held together in your heart and mind. 

  

It is vital to the life of any and all relationships that we :

(a)   practice a profound grace and acceptance of others and ourselves with all our imperfections. In other words, we accept others and ourselves not as we want them to be or wish we ourselves were, but just as we really are…

and

(b)  continue to want to grow, change, and develop into healthier, whole, and more loving versions of ourselves. And we learn and accept that others have a role to play in helping us become that better version of ourselves.

 

We tend to get stuck in one or the other of these areas. It is especially popular to insist that we should never challenge or change our partner. That true love is loving everything about your partner, loving them just as they are. Our counter point to this is that loving others doesn’t have to be affirming everything about them- that is ridiculous.  A better idea of love is to think of love as staying committed to them and their growth.  It is a dance of not trying to control them or steer them arbitrarily in the way you want them to go, but of caring enough for their health and wholeness to confront them when it really is for their benefit.  But if this confrontation is done with ulterior motives, with self-righteousness, or without the foundation of a radical acceptance built over time, then it will almost always be disregarded for the simple reason that our egos are fragile things.

 

 

/ the exercise /

So our analysis points us back to the fact that this all begins with a certain posture of the heart. You have to care enough about the other person for a relationship to work. When we care enough our love is made concrete in actions, and when others experience this love with some consistency over the long haul, they are more likely to feel safe enough to be vulnerable about their own imperfections and find the motivation to grow.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson #24.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Marriage is a noun and a verb.

 

/ unpacked /

 

We elected to name this curriculum a marriaging curriculum instead of a marriage curriculum because we believe too often we conceive marriage more as a noun than a verb. We put all this work into finding the “right” person (versus being the right person) and then act like the finish line is our wedding day. 99% of the films and novels indulge our appetite for the romantic build up and once the knot is tied we are left with the impression that it is smooth sailing from then on out. Marriage is presented as a noun- a state of achievement, a state that is static and permanent. We’ve done ourselves a disservice by failing to grapple with marriage as a verb. Marriage is an adventure of continual learning and growth, it is at once an intense practice session and game day. That is why we have given preferential treatment to the word marriaging. Marriaging is something you do. Don’t ever forget we are active players all the time. But for this Lesson 24, we want to pause to acknowledge how much we do still believe marriage is also a noun.

 

We do not pretend to have a definitive argument for why marrying is better than staying in a long-term unmarried relationship with a partner, but below we offer 3 arguments that have swayed us when we have taken up the juror’s seat.  

 

First. We are leading with the rationale that speaks loudest to us. Our first reason for favoring a permanent, covenantal notion of marriage, that is, making a public commitment (vow) to enter a unique and exclusive union with someone, is that as human beings we long for things, relationships, rituals, causes, or beliefs that are bigger than ourselves to live for. You don’t have to believe in God or belong to a faith community to sense that if there is no meaning beyond the meaning you construct then everything becomes meaningless. Our modern despair is mostly attributable to the fact that in our efforts to shed the shackles of traditions, we have stripped the world of all meaning, and the purpose of our existence has vanished. You don’t have to read Viktor Frankl to get this. I’ll listen to people touting the benefits of cosmic insignificance as their faith system but hear these same people seeking meaning and direction through their placebo beliefs. I may be wrong, but everyone I’ve ever met, whatever their belief system or lack thereof, if we come to a place in a conversation that goes beyond the superficial, there is always something that surfaces—some passion or pursuit, some cause, some person, or some desire –that is functioning as part of the reason they get up in the morning. There are neuro-biological as well as socio-evolutionary explanations for this basic human instinct, and I would add spiritual explanations in this mix too. But the point here is just this: humans want freedom but paradoxically crave to be caught up in something bigger than themselves. Increasingly as a society we are coming into an intellectual belief that there is no real and ultimate meaning to life, but our hearts don’t seem willing to follow our brains. Our hearts are better mapped by Maslow than by Dawkins.  When this craving of the human heart or spirit slams into this theory of our insignificance we are sent spiraling into cognitive dissonance. Optimistic nihilism doesn’t remain optimistic for long, it gives way to cultural despair and malaise.

 

Let us be clear, we are not saying that the human instinct and desire for meaning is the absolute proof that there is a higher meaning to life than you or I as an individual can ascribe to it…but we do think it is reasonable (inductive reasoning) to conclude that the universal human instinct or desire for meaning lays the ground for logically believing that meaning isn’t an artificial construct.

 

Marriage, as a peculiar human and social rite and institution, bestows on us a higher purpose than the popular hyper-individualistic, no-need-to-make-it-official, philosophy. People are quick to say that they don’t need a marriage license to be committed to their partner. And this is of course true. But it isn’t as simple as that either. Marriage codifies what this commitment looks like. Marriage spells out the relationship in a more indelible ink. You have upped the ante. You have formally united yourself to another, elevating that person’s role in your life and redefining your own personhood in an expansive way to include another. You are no longer just two individuals, you have a new public identity, you are a spouse, a member of a new mini-society created through marriage. Marriage is our social way of recognizing how you the individual have in a real and lasting sense forfeited your full autonomy in order to partake in a new social dynamic, this state we call marriage.

 

Our second reason why marriage is to be preferred over unmarried relationships has to do with skin in the game. Marriage is the highest form of skin in the game. You take on considerably more risks when you have skin in the game, but the upside is that there is more potential for rewards. When you publicly commit to your partner, you have put yourself out there to be held accountable. The risks are real. All the things that would tear apart a nonmarried couple are only magnified and made even uglier if a divorce came to pass. Someone once said “marriage is a giant inhibitor of impulsiveness” and there is some truth to this. A legal marriage puts additional incentives and guard rails into place to protect against short term impulses and temptations. One can argue that increasing the penalty of violating a marriage vow is not cultivating a healthy commitment to your partner but is using fear to keep you together, which will likely foster even worse traits in both parties. That may be the case, but it can just as easily be the case that if one has deep self-understanding, they can see the wisdom in making it harder to give up on their partner, harder to uproot the relationship and part ways, because pain can be a teacher. It can buy you the time necessary to engage in reflection and receive therapy. The difficulty in breaking up a legal covenant can buy you the time you likely need to repair the relationship. If you have read James Clear’s Atomic Habits, recall how you want to make a bad choice unattractive and difficult. He advocates that intentionally obstructing a pathway we have decided in our best moments that we don’t want to go down is a wise way to hack yourself.  When we stay unmarried we may think we are doing ourselves and our partner a favor, but we could be shortchanging our development and the likelihood of experiencing lasting love.

 

When you have more skin in the game you also have more potential for reward. Here is the upshot of covenantal marriage. When we make our union with our partner a nonnegotiable fixture in our life, we make ourselves even more vulnerable to another human being. This opens us up to the potential for greater hurt, but also to a greater security and space for love. The “until death do us part” of marriage is comedically viewed as a prison sentence, but is it not also the natural foundation and home for love to abide in? When we marry we are making a statement about just how intentional our love is. We are recognizing that in the future we may not always feel very loving towards each other, but we believe we can still love each other in our actions and that staying true to this love over the long haul will provide rewards (for us as a couple, for our children, for us individually, for the community) that are not possible if we abort the relationship. The rewards of having this skin in the game of marriage increase over time. You withdrawal your investment too soon and you will never be able get the same ROI. You will never know what could have been. Marriage logically fits the intentions of those who want to stay in a committed relationship.  

 

Third, marriage provides a concrete external constraint and as all good writers and thinkers will tell you, having some constraints empowers creativity. Superficially, we may feel that boundaries are oppressive and stymie us, but in reality having some constraints serves to clarify and focus our energy in amazing and unmatched ways. I’ve heard many writers talk about how they tapped into their deepest well of creativity when they were under constraints, when they acknowledged and worked within boundaries.  We believe this principle profoundly applies to marriage. When you believe there is no exit strategy then the crises that arise are now funneled into either opportunities to problem solve and grow stronger together or to fall into a state of cold or indifferent co-existence.  The constraint of marriage can therefore be the impetus for more creative problem solving, for building a character robust with patience, forgiveness, humility, selflessness, and the ability to not only hold to your hopes and dreams but to hold and help build the dreams of your partner. Marriage is like a dance, learning to read your partner while submitting to the constraints of the music, you eventually replace your awkwardness with an almost infinite array of improvisation. Together you can create something more beautiful than you could apart from each other. Marriage is a way of acknowledging this truth. Together there can be more joy.

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Lesson #25.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Half the time we are fighting we are not really at odds, we are just not communicating well.

 

If you can eliminate half your conflicts imagine how much more peace you would be experiencing!

 

/ unpacked /

 

The other half of the time we may truly be at odds. But once again, the answer remains good communication. Good communication doesn’t avoid conflict. Good communication learns to do conflict well. “Conflicting well” involves putting the disagreement in proper perspective, listening carefully to what you partner is not only saying but meaning, checking your own heart to see if you are truly wanting your partner’s needs to be met, and being ready to compromise.

 

Conflicts done well are actually beneficial for a relationship. They follow the logic of Nassim Taleb’s antifragility concept.

 

Conflict is invariably stressful, and many of us simply avoid conflict because we have seen it done poorly and believe it just makes matters worse (which indeed it can). But avoidance nurses stress and discontentment as well. The better route to take is to learn how to communicate well and address the conflict head on. This approach is like lifting heavy weights at the gym. Your muscles will strain and tear a bit under the stress, but you will find you have grown stronger in the long run. You don’t want a marriage that is superficially calm but with turbulent water below.

 

/ the exercise /

Journal.

When my spouse and I have a conflict, how often do I ask clarifying questions to truly understand their perspective?

 

 

Lesson #26.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

When we are experiencing a genuine conflict with our partner we need sensible rules to bring out the best in both of us.

 

Smart couples come up with strategies that work for them.

 

/ unpacked /

 

Here is a starting place: Marshall Rosenberg’s Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life.

 

I read this in grad school and have returned off and on to it over the years.

Nonviolent Communication, or NVC, as it is called, boils down to 4 components:

 

1.    Observation.

a.    There is a chapter devoted on explaining how to make observations and not evaluations. If you are anything like me, this is tough. It is so natural to make judgments but Rosenberg argues convincingly that when we make evaluations our partner hears criticism and shuts down. This takes practice. And when we fail we should let our partner call us out in this and humbly try again.

2.    Feeling.

a.    Second, we share how we feel in relation to what happened, the observation.

3.    Needs.

a.    Then we express an underlying desire or need of ours that is driving the feeling we expressed.

4.    Requests.

a.    Last, we gently request a very specific action from our partner that relates to our need being met. It is important that the request is clear and specific. I also think that at this point the partner should be allowed space to modify the request. Dialogue is essential, and so is compromise.

 

Restorative Circles is a similar framework for engaging in constructive communication. In Restorative Circles the way needs or desires are shared is through the question “What do we want known and by whom?”  I really like how in Restorative Circles when desires are shared there is space built in to ask the person listening to share what they heard the other person say. This is followed up by checking in to see if this is what the first person wanted the other person to hear. So there is this back and forth to check in and make sure there is mutual understanding. When solutions are generated, once again we want the request to be actionable and measurable. This allows for honest accountability. The key enabling this accountability to stay healthy and not turn into policing is that both parties agree to future behavior or actions, so both parties are invested. This is why we can’t shortchange the work of thorough dialogue premised on our honest feelings and the willingness to compromise for the greater good.

 

  

/ the exercise /

 

Become intimate with Marshall Rosenberg’s Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life.

Go and watch YouTube videos on Restorative Circles.

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

Lesson #27.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

“We talk to others or at them without knowing how to engage in a dialogue with them.” Rosenberg, NVC

 

/ unpacked /

Here is a step by step system we developed with our children for arguments based on NVC and restorative circle principles. It contains explanations that reflect our faith bias, but the steps can stand without these explanations as well.

 

1.    Express an invitation.

Invite ourselves and others to enter a conversation with the mutual intent of communicating well so that we may experience God’s shalom. If you are not a person of faith, it still is important to have an idea of why your relationship with this other human matters. A real desire for reconciliation is almost always a prerequisite. This desire is needed to fuel the courage necessary to be vulnerable and to do the hard work of listening.

2.    Share an observation, not evaluation.

At this juncture we don’t want to play the judge. On the one hand as Christians we are committed to letting God be the one final judge. We also acknowledge that even when we are called to judge, our judging starts with ourselves, with the realization that the path to discernment and truth starts not with a spirit of reforming the other person but of humbling ourselves. Or as Jesus put it, removing the log that is in our own eye. Jesus assumes that we all have debris in our eyes. This debris blinds us to our biases and so the wise thing to realize is that our observations are conflated with our interpretations of realty. Psychologically, the difference between an observation and evaluation is critical because people immediately shut down or go on the defensive when they feel they are being evaluated or judged.

3.    Share your desire.

When we share our desires we are sharing “What we want known and by whom.” Many times we are frustrated because we don’t feel like we are heard. This step addresses this basic human need. It also forces us to take responsibility for what we are feeling.  In our family, we encourage everyone to also do some introspection during this step. We want to prayerfully consider the intensity of our desires at this step. Are our desires out of control, out of healthy proportion or bounds? It is fine to have desires but we also believe we are responsible for ordering our desires in a healthy manner and being aware when they become too strong.

4.    Ask what did the other person hear?

They share and you listen now. This step is part of the restorative circles process and it is genius. So often we are talking past each other. We discover that perhaps we weren’t articulating our desire very well or maybe our tone of voice or some prior trauma has colored how the other person has interpreted the incident.

5.    Check to see if that is what you wanted understood.

At this point you are making progress. You now know if the other person has understood what you observed and are feeling. If when they share back to you what they heard you saying and it turns out that this was not what you wanted to communicate, now is your opportunity to try and communicate your desire better. Again, the goal in sharing your desire is to create an opportunity, a space, for the human heart in the them to connect to the humanity in you.

6.   Reciprocate.

Do this by repeating steps 2-5, but switching roles, letting the other person share an observation, desire, you offer up what you heard, and they check in and respond if they want to clarify their desire.

I think it is crucial to note at this juncture that there is no blame game going on here. No recalling former wounds. No accusations. An observation might seem close to an accusation, but it is very different, as we are attaching our desires to the observation, not the other person’s issues or faults. Essentially we are not trying to rectify past behavior but illuminate what happened, why it is was hurtful or unhelpful, and how we can move forward differently. That is very important. Nevertheless, I do think that if either party at this point wants to ask for forgiveness that there is a restorative power in asking and granting that during this step. I think Rosenberg wisely didn’t include this because forgiveness connotates blame and this triggers a deep-seated desire to justify ourselves which in turn stymies this entire conversation. Many cultures have an ugly history with blame and shame and the human heart is so fragile and insecure that owning up to our mistakes wrecks us. This is a problem we’ll discuss more in the next lesson, but for now I want you to know why this process doesn’t emphasize repentance and forgiveness, but owning our desires, sharing them clearly, listening to others and making requests.

7.    Humbly make our requests known.

Be specific with your request. Saying “I’d like you to be a better listener” is too ambiguous. Saying “I’d like to have a 30 minute window to catch up with you every day with no phones or screens vying for your attention” will have more purchase.

8.    Invite the other to agree, disagree, or modify the request.

Again, we want to be specific. We are really just going back and forth here as anyone would in a healthy conversation. This is communication 101, but sometimes it helps just to slow down and go through the motion with intentionality. When I played basketball in practice we would do “dot shots.” It was a simply shooting drill from about 4-5 feet away from the hoop to practice your shooting form. These 10 steps can serve you in a similar fashion, as a way to practice the form of a quality conversation.

9.    Agree on future actions.

This could have been rolled into the end of step #8, but just to be clear, we want to reach a mutual understanding and agree upon the request(s) that is being made.

10. Remember what was learned and agreed upon by instituting a new system to encourage the desire action. This ties into the fourth movement of this curriculum and will be covered in depth in later lessons. Briefly, we don’t want to rely on our will power to change. If the incident that sparked the need for this conversation arose out of a pattern in our relationship (and most do), it is important to come to terms with how this habit is likely entrenched and how it is reinforced. Gaining the skills to alter habits is possible.

 

 

/ the exercise /

If it makes sense for your situation, try implementing these 10 steps the next time a conflict arises.

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

Lesson #28.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Self-justification is the ultimate trap and tragedy.

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

This lesson probably belongs in the second movement of interiority developer, but we’ve placed it here in solutions generator to highlight how destructive self-justification is not only to yourself and your personal growth, but to your marriage.

 

We debated whether or not to address the problems that arise from our human tendency to justify ourselves from the field of psychology or the study of theology. Psychology’s approach would turn the conversation towards unmet needs and insecurities derived from childhood experiences. While these factors certainly play a role in our propensity towards self-justification, we are of the mind that something much more profound is going on. Here, more than anywhere else, is where we feel the need to bring up spirituality and an interpretation that comes from a faith tradition. For us, the human impulse to justify itself is at the center of all that is wrong with humanity.

 

In our faith tradition the Creator is a social being, a triune God, who was experiencing love before and outside of time. Nevertheless, for reasons not fully disclosed, God wanted to expand the experience of love and did so through the creation of a universe.

 

True love is always a creative act and it is God's love that spoke the universe into being. A significant but often overlooked implication of this is that creation has always been more gratuitous than it has been useful.

 

This is absurdly humbling and at the same time liberating. If our existence hinged on our usefulness to God we would live under an unbearable weight. Unfortunately, religion has tended to preach the opposite of this, making everything about us and what we are doing or not doing.  When we imagine our lives to be worthwhile because of what we do or achieve we have fundamentally detached ourselves from reality. This is why I believe grace to be the most undervalued word in our world. The tragic result of the theological event called the fall, of human separation from God, is that now we are left scrambling through this life under the delusion that either our lives are meaningless or that we have to construct the meaning. Psychology argues that our impulse to justify ourselves is derived from a lack of external affirmation in early development or an under-formed self-esteem, whereas we are suggesting that the impulse can be traced to something much more entrenched in the human heart, a spiritual state of separation from God that leaves us fundamentally insecure and disoriented. In this state humans sense something is missing, and life becomes a hopeless journey to satiate the void, to justify our existence. Some of us try to justify our existence by seeking out pleasure or comfort, others of us look for some kind of external validation that we are good or special people. In all these cases, the common denominator is that we bear the burden of our life’s meaning. Maybe we decide there is no meaning, some intellectuals praise this scenario as liberating, but good luck finding lasting inner peace with that belief and good luck knowing how to argue cogently for justice issues in the public sphere. Most people, while claiming agnosticism, nevertheless seem to live life under the thumb of this drive to succeed, to prove something to someone-even if that someone is only yourself.

 

Whereas when we embrace creation (and the new creation, which is what Jesus is all about) as the gratuitous act of God, we can see that enough has been given and nothing is demanded. All that remains is invitation. Invitation to relax and receive. Invitation to rest in, to recognize and praise the beauty of all that is. And then invitation to sub-create. Which I take to mean that we, already joined to our Maker, already experiencing God's complete abundance, in lack of nothing and with nothing to prove, nonetheless for the sheer joy of making, have the privilege of participating in divine extropy. Somehow, mysteriously, we are invited to join in the creation of an ever new beauty. Extropy is by definition an increase in order, a sort of paradoxical marriage of increasing information, inputs, and complexity but instead of spiraling into chaos or confusion, merges and mixes to an ever more delightful, surprising, enlightening, and articulate form. I would use the word art if we could shed the diminutive boundaries our minds conjure up. All is and forever more will be gracious art. The creation is God's art and what greater purpose is there to art than to admire and be moved by its beauty.

 

This view is explicitly Christian and in Christianity God displays God’s intimacy with creation through the miraculous birth of Jesus, the God-human. Jesus embodies perfect humanity through perfect harmony between Creator and creation. But Jesus’ primary mission was not to set an example to follow, but to atone for all the evil, the hate, the violence, the greed and the selfishness that has resulted from our separation from a good Creator. Jesus’ mission was to justify us before God, that is, to recreate us in God’s image once again with God’s Spirit inside us so that joined to God we may live out our days in full gratitude and awareness of all this abundance that is the masterpiece of God. We become liberated to re-engage the world not as its slave nor as its redeemer, but as mere gift from God to be enjoyed. Christians see Jesus as this enormous blanket that covers and smoothers all that is wrong not only with the world, but with ourselves. In Christianity, God is the one who fixes things, not us. That is the bottom line. Grace. All grace. And we are invited to receive and rejoice in it. The huge implication of this understanding of reality is that there is no longer any need to justify ourselves. No need to prove we are right in an argument. Your existence is enough. Your mere existence is the miracle that the Author of the universe delights in. You are beautiful in God’s eyes. The Christian faith believes this is the heart of God as God has revealed it in Jesus.

 

Ironically, the religion of Christianity has mostly buried this grace and liberty under the law and rules that only nurture self-righteousness, the opposite of what we see in the grace of Jesus. Nevertheless, the invitation remains, and for the curious souls who stumble upon this grace, there opens up an opportunity to see that the human project of self-justification for the terrible trap and tragedy it is.

 

A marriage where even one of the partners doesn’t feel the need to prove their point, to argue their case, to attack the other because of their own insecurity or woundedness has the necessary ingredients for something truly lovely to bloom. A person grounded in a belief that they are already loved by God perfectly, unconditionally- already justified fully by grace alone through the work of Jesus on the cross- is able to move in and out of all their relationships with other humans with a wonderful blend of humility and confidence. Humility, because they know they are no better than anyone else, they needed the grace of Jesus to set them right, but confidence because they know they are loved by the Creator of the universe, so the opinions of any human (including our own opinions of ourself) are relativized to almost meaninglessness.

  

 

/ the exercise /

 

For those interested in a spiritual self-reflection, read Tim Keller’s The Freedom of Self-Forgetfulness

 

 

 

  

 

 

Lesson #29.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Come up with your own rules for how to navigate disagreements.

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

Talk to couples you respect and ask them how they talk things through.

 

Have trustworthy friends who you can vent with but who will steer you back to your partner in love. If you don’t have such people in your life or if they can’t make time to invest in you, seek out a therapist. Or seek out a good therapist anyway as an investment in your relationship.

 

Vet your therapist like you would your friends, ensuring that they are just as committed as you are to your marriage’s success. Many therapists promote a very western preference for the individual over the marital unit. If you hold to a traditional, covenantal understanding of marriage you should seek a therapist who shares this same persuasion. Boundaries can be your friend.

 

 

/ the exercise /

 

Read Chapter 8, The Two Kinds of Marital Conflict, in The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work, by John M. Gottman

 

Gottman writes that there are perpetual problems and solvable problems in a marriage. Perpetual problems don’t necessitate divorce, but they are problems that won’t go away and therefore require both acknowledgement and strategies to cope in order for the marriage to continue in a healthy manner.

 

 

 

 

Transitioning into the fourth movement: Systems Creator

 

Lesson #30.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

“We don’t rise to the level of our goals, we fall to the level of our systems.” James Clear, Atomic Habits

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

Up until this point this curriculum has been encouraging us to engage in greater self-reflection combined with greater communication with our spouse. Greater awareness of ourselves and our partners allows us to better articulate the hopes and dreams we have for our marriage. But setting goals doesn’t accomplish anything. Sometimes we mistakenly think that if we just know what it is we want then we will naturally drive towards it. Unfortunately, we are creatures of habit and changing course is not so simple. The real magic of behavior change comes through putting systems in place so that what we do day in and day out conforms to the kind of person or couple we want to become.

 

 

/ the exercise /

 

Meditate on this quote like it is scripture:

“We don’t rise to the level of our goals, we fall to the level of our systems.”

 

 

 

 

 

  

Lesson #31.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Habit formation 101

 

“Process saves us from the poverty of our intentions”- Elizabeth King

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

We have talked about developing an interior life, a self-awareness that we can bring into our marriage. We have touched on some strategies for communicating better with our partner. Hopefully our intentions are both good and clear. But our intentions are not enough.

 

Couples need habits, routines, rituals- call them what you like- they are strategies that enable us to execute the new ways we want to think about our relationship and the new ways we want to interact with each other.

 

Often times it is not motivation we need so much as a plan. We need to take that monumental step of saying when and where we are going to do the thing it is we want to do. It needs to be on our calendar. And it needs to be nonnegotiable.

 

The most profound insight from James Clear’s Atomic Habits and one that I’ve seen other thinkers on the subject highlight is this: habit formation is about identity.

 

Identity formation is insanely complex because identity can be both bestowed upon us (from sources outside of us) and shaped by that which is within us. Most often our perception of ourselves and the way others view us are in a kind of dialogue, where each is mutually informing the other. The take away from this for our conversation is simple: what we think about ourselves matters. How we self-identify is a psychological tool to shape how we act and therefore the kind of person we really are. And conversely, how we act, that is to say the things we do, is an even greater tool to shape how we come to self-identify.

 

So if you want to be the “fun” spouse who surprises his wife, start planning and executing surprises. If you surprise your wife with something fun once, that is a great first step. Do it again. And again. Make it a habit. Put in on your own secret calendar. Dictate how often you want to do this and stick to it. And then eventually, or gradually, there will come a point where you and those around you will start to see you as that fun husband who likes to surprise his wife. Each time you follow through on that unexpected date night or random gift, you will be accumulating evidence for that invisible jury that resides in your head, the jury that is responsible for determining how you self-identify.

 

When we develop identities around areas of ourselves that we like, positive identities, these traits become a little bit easier to exercise because they are running with the wind of our ego behind them. Nursing our ego can raise another set of questions, but the point here is that we can use an understanding of our psychology to hack ourselves and make the behaviors we want to be doing easier to pull off.

 

 

/ the exercise /

 

Journal.

What kind of spouse do I think I currently am? What  kind of spouse do I want to be? Are there changes I would like to make? What systems could I put in place to enable these changes?

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Lesson #32.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Co-create with your partner systems that help your relationship flourish.

 

Start with subtraction.

 

 

/ unpacked /

Before you sit down to work on developing and introducing new systems to sweeten your relationship, a better first step is to start with the de-creation of existing systems that are not working well for you. In habit formation I’d argue there is an alternate “order of operations” (remember this from math class?) and the first step should always be subtraction.

 

Undoubtably your life is not a blank slate. You have a lot going on. You have a lot in motion. Think of your life as a creative endeavor, a work of art, a novel. All creative endeavors need enormous amounts of editing before they are really worth launching. 

 

There is an even more important rationale for starting with subtraction, which is this: often we are better at identifying what is not working than what is (or what will) work. Hindsight is 20/20. Predicting the future or what will work for you is much more precarious. So if you begin with a commitment to removing what is clearly toxic, harmful, or just not helpful, you will be more effective.  Subtraction also makes sense as the first step as it can help to create the necessary space for the new systems that you want to implement.

 

What should you subtract? This is a personal question. We can riff on the common answers couples give to this question but ultimately you need to decide what it is that if removed, would help your relationship. It may be that you are overcommitted. Are you working extra hours or extra jobs to pay for stuff that is itself really extra, unnecessary? Can your definition of what is necessary change? Or maybe you are not engaging in enough quality conversation when you are around your partner but you notice you both spend a lot of time looking down at your phones.  This lesson featured a picture of the kSafe, a “Time locking container,” a brilliant little device that you can stick your phone or remote or controller inside of and set it’s clock so that it makes the distracting device unavailable for whatever time you set it to.

 

We encourage you to find one significant thing to subtract and start with that. I like hyper vigilant types that jump all in but most people will experience overwhelm if they get too ambitious. This is somewhat comparable to trying to change the way you eat. As the former director of an urban farm, I was constantly hearing stories of people overhauling their diets. On rare occasions folks could make it work, but frequently the drastic changes were too much and people fell back on patterns that were familiar. A better approach to eating healthier would be to start with subtraction and to start by eliminating the worst player in nearly every American’s diet- drinks with sugar. Focusing on that one category, and being pretty fundamentalistic about it is a wiser strategy than trying to go through your cupboards and dump anything with sugar or high fructose corn syrup. We want to make our changes easier and more attractive so that we are not always relying on will power.

  

/ the exercise /

What would you like to subtract from your current life? Ask your spouse what they would like to subtract. Together think of systems to put in place to assist you in your efforts to subtract.

 

 

 

 

  

 

Lesson #33.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Co-create with your partner systems that help your relationship flourish.

 

Move to addition.

 

/ unpacked /

 

Once you’ve done the subtraction, let’s say you’ve committed to putting your phones into the kSafe every evening starting at 9pm, you can then do some addition. In your newfound space, maybe you and your partner make a ritual of exchanging back rubs while you discuss the day and then end with a glass of wine and a favorite snack while you day dream about an upcoming trip. Review James Clear’s Four Laws of Behavior Change (Cue-Craving-Response-Reward) which he sums nicely as “make it obvious, make it attractive, make it easy, make it satisfying.” In our pretend scenario, back rubs help alleviate or counteract any stress that arises as you review your day and then enjoying your wine and favorite snack while you day dream together serves as nice reward to reinforce your desire to be together and dream together.

 

 

/ the exercise /

Find time to discuss with your spouse what it is you would like to add into your life or relationship. Once again, don’t stop there, but design a system to build this into your schedule or routine.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson #34.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Hack yourself.

Practice your imperfect.

Emotional intimacy comes with vulnerability but it takes practice.

 

/ unpacked /

 

We crave emotional intimacy in our marriages because intimacy brings a sense of security to our fragile selves in this otherwise daunting and sometimes dangerous world. But intimacy isn’t always easy to achieve. Intimacy requires vulnerability, or opening up about ourselves in ways that reveal we don’t have it all together.

 

All of our desires come packaged with fears. Every desire has an underbelly, which is the potential for that desire to go unmet, to be thwarted, or maybe for the opposite scenario to play out. Sharing our desires is a part of being vulnerable because we are putting what we want out there into the world and there is no guarantee that what we want will come to pass. However, if we take this one step further, and learn to share our fears, our anxieties, our imperfections, and even our weaknesses, we will be doing ourselves and everyone else around us a favor. The reason is simple: we will be normalizing our fears and imperfections. This is not to say we are grateful for them or want them to stick around. But when we normalize something we take away the stigma that so often leads to further problems. Deeper problems. Compounded problems. When we fail to normalize our imperfections we are inadvertently nursing an entire set of additional problems. Problems like: hiding, avoidance, shame, self-justification, blaming, despair, or self-righteousness. Being vulnerable is publicly acknowledging your fears. It is admitting you are not perfect. If certain things don’t go your way, you will be hurt. The perfect person may remain unfazed, calm, and in control. The perfect person knows how to respond in wisdom and generosity in all situations. The perfect person has their shit together and knows how to help anyone and everyone around them when their family and friends falter. But in reality no such person exists. Whenever you are able to rehearse your imperfections, share your fears, and admit your weaknesses to your spouse, you are being vulnerable, and that vulnerability makes you more human and more relatable. Too often we fall for the lie that those around us need us to be strong. More often those around us need us just to be humble and open. Because when we are humble and open our pain and fears help those around us cope with their pain and fears. We come to see that we are not alone.

 

So practicing your imperfect does not mean intentionally doing stuff you know is wrong or harmful. It means practice sharing your imperfections with those you love in the right context to build trust and create a climate for healthy growth.

 

I want to be clear, we are not praising our imperfections. Nor are we ignoring them or going forward in resignation. We are learning how to consistently acknowledge them to those nearest to us instead of masking them. At this point you might be thinking “easier said than done.” Or, “where do we get the courage to do this?” Glad you asked.

 

Different people have different answers. I’ll share three common responses, two of which I believe have merit and one I think will fail you.

 

First, people of faith may cite that they gain the strength to be vulnerable because they believe they are loved by God by sheer grace. The heart of the Christian faith is God becoming vulnerable in the person and work of Jesus Christ, not because God had to, but because God wanted to reconcile his relationship with the creatures he made. If you believe there is a God who loves you just because he loves you-in other words the love has no reason (this is what the term agape love in the New Testament denotes) then there is no way for you to lose God’s love and approval. There is no reason to hide your imperfection and weakness. As the Scripture says, “perfect love casts out fear.”

 

Second, others rationalize that since we can definitively argue that everyone is imperfect in their own ways, logic would tell us that the only rational way to interact with each other is to treat each other as equals with a balanced mixture of grace, bemusement, and horror. In other words, this case for vulnerability looks out at the world empirically and finds everyone has their issues. And if everyone has their own issues, it doesn’t make sense that you should be scared or ashamed of yours. The sane thing to do is to contextualize your imperfections and see that you are more normal than you think.

 

Third, and unfortunately the most popular approach, is a kind of cheap reassurance that what we need is to see ourselves as worthy of love. On the surface this sounds noble and right. But psychologically this approach is a house of cards. The reasoning goes like this: when we believe we are worthy of love we will have the courage to be vulnerable because no matter what others think of us when we share our fears and faults, we can trust in that belief that we are special and worthy. Unlike the first two approaches, it denies that our identity is largely built upon those outside of us and instead insists that we can conjure up our meaning and worth on our own. This approach is intrinsically individualistic. It may be tenable in a philosophical textbook, but in real life those of us who are honest come to an experiential understanding that we can’t escape our need for love and approval from others, from those outside of us. Think back to Ubuntu. The first two approaches to vulnerability acknowledge that the ability to be vulnerable is empowered by the reality of community, whereas this last approach disregards outside voices in a vain attempt to establish a superior a priori value. Another part of the built-in problem of this last approach is that if we are telling ourselves that we are worthy of love it is counter-productive to that narrative to share our imperfections and weaknesses. How do we reconcile what it is that is worthy of love in us while we are sharing what is less than flattering about us? It gets messy and bipolar quick. It also lends itself nicely to a kind of self-justification where there is nothing about us that ought to change.

 

It takes greater courage to face the possibility that perhaps we are not inherently worthy of love. It may be the ultimate act of vulnerability. Yet, if we dare to do this, in a twist of irony, we open ourselves up to being genuinely loved.

  

/ the exercise /

In a journal entry take the time to reflect on the person you feel safest around. Why do you feel safe around this person?

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson #35.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Hack yourself.

Practice your imperfect.

Emotional intimacy comes with vulnerability but it takes practice.

 

/ unpacked /

 

What does this vulnerability look like in practice? Let’s pretend you have a teenage son. You and your spouse both know yourselves to be in the category of parents of who have tried hard to love on their children and you both feel as if you have done a better-than-average job. Nevertheless, parenting is not for the faint of heart and each child miraculously presents problems for which no book seems to offer a solution. Your wonderful son, who you still dearly love, has taken to not only making bad jokes around the clock which make you grit your teeth, but an array of other behaviors which can be summed up as insubordinate.

One spouse believes this new trend needs to be squashed quickly with more structure and compliance, but the other feels that more space for independence is necessary. This scenario, like countless others, calls for vulnerability. Vulnerability is more than just sharing your thoughts or desires on the subject at hand- though it is certainly that. Vulnerability will be a practice of your imperfect, so it will call on you to confess the fears lying underneath your desires. For example, one spouse may be wanting more compliance not just to create a more orderly environment in the house, but also out of a fear that if the son is permitted to get away with whatever he wants he will be building habits that will harm him later in life. The other spouse may also want more order or less conflict in the house and feel that the current confrontations with the teenager are only generating more friction. This spouse may fear that forcing compliance will foster inner resentment and strain the parent-child relationship further.  Neither spouse is wrong and opening up and sharing your fears doesn’t resolve the issue of how to interact with your teenager. However, practicing your imperfections, sharing your deeper fears, invites greater sympathy and understanding. It often reduces the feelings of opposition and superiority that can arise in a relational conflict.

 

/ the exercise /

Practice being vulnerable with your spouse by sharing a fear you have.

 

Lesson #36.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Hack yourself.

Practice your imperfect.

Emotional intimacy comes with vulnerability but it takes practice.

 

/ unpacked /

 

Brene Brown has a wealth of down to earth relational knowledge. Perhaps my favorite in regards to marriage came from a podcast with Tim Ferriss. She and Tim talked about the importance of checking in with your partner regularly. A practice of being vulnerable. One strategy they mentioned was just sharing:

1)    What is working well. What you feel like you are doing well. What you feel like your spouse is doing well.

2)    In this past week I really appreciated this…

3)    I would like more of…

 

Brene Brown slams the idea that marriage should be a 50/50 partnership. Instead, she argues for what her and her husband call the 80/20. What this means is that you rate yourself on a scale ranging from 0 to 100, with 100 meaning that you are doing really well, your energy and capacity for patience, kindness, and investment is at its max or perfect state, and a 0 indicating that you have nothing in your tank, you are emotionally bankrupt, exhausted, spent, and unable to contribute in the ways you want to. It is key that you are rating your energy and ability to show up because you have the inside scoop on yourself. But you each share what percentage you are at. And then here is how it works. If your combined total is anything less than 100, you stop what you are doing and sit down at the table and figure out a “plan of kindness towards each other.”

 

If one partner is at a 20  and the other is an 80, the 80 person is sharing that they can cover the other person because they have sufficient reserves left in the tank. But there are times when life is hard for both partners and this checking in is designed to recognize that when both partners are under stress and feel depleted that is often a precursor to marital fights. By checking in you recognize the tension and exhaustion in the room and address the real underlying issues instead of defaulting into cheap shots at the one you love.

Brown said marriage is not 50/50, a partnership works when you can carry their 20 or they can carry your 30. And when you both just have 20 you have a plan so you don’t hurt each other.  You sit down and figure out what you can take off the table to give yourselves grace. Maybe you don’t try to cook a great dinner that night, but order-in, or you cancel a meeting or outing and replace it with something that will fortify your spirit. And the process of having this conversation with each other helps to bring your awareness of the other person’s needs to the forefront and encourages us to treat each other with greater empathy and generosity. A couple days later you can check in again and if you are still not at a combined 100, you strategize again, skip a kid’s sports practice, make room for a hot bath and your favorite music, or you name what exactly it is that you need.

 

We think another incredible advantage of doing this kind of “check in” with your spouse is that over time you will better recognize patterns. For example, it may become clear that one partner is consistently returning home depleted. Eventually, you can together discern that some larger structural change, a change in one or more of your systems (a job, routine, sleep patterns, commitments, etc) should be explored.

 

/ the exercise /

Schedule a time this week to try these “checking in” practices.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson #37.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Hack yourself.

Passion has a second stage.

You just need to know the right exercises.

 

What you need is: A Rigorous Training Program for the Imagination

Lessons 37, 38 and 39 are for couples that want to pursue not just emotional intimacy in their marriage, but more sexual attraction and romance. Not all couples want erotic desire to be a component of their marital relationship, and that is totally fine! But for those that do wish to continue to pursue physical passion past the early stages of a marriage the following lessons lay out strategies to invigorate eros over the duration of a marriage.

 

/ unpacked /

Esther Perel wrote:

If we are to maintain desire with one person over time we must be able to bring a sense of the unknown into a familiar space. In the words of Proust, ‘The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes.’

 

 

The Tenets of Sustained Passion…

 

Can we want what we already have? We believe not only that you can, but that learning how is the path to a life of contentment. Yet we are not going to pretend that this is easy.

 

The first tenet we’ll have to come to terms with is this: the “falling-in-love-passion” we experience at the beginning of a relationship is not sustainable. A marriage that wants to have passion over the long haul must believe that there can be a stage two to passion.

 

What is the second stage of passion? It is very, very, very different from the first. The first is almost involuntary and largely subconscious, you feel lost in love. The second is totally voluntary and conscious. In fact, you will be amazed at how intentional you have to be. Whereas the first time around it felt like an invisible hand was guiding you together, in the second stage it may feel like you have a tow strap wrapped around your waist and you are having to drag a car without wheels down a gravel road. There is an inertia that needs to be overcome to achieve Stage Two of passion. This inertia leads us into our second tenet:

 

Stage 2 of passion eros is sustained by communicating to our partner what it is that turns us on. Sorry, there isn’t a way around this. As you progress in your marriage you come to realize that your partner isn’t going to figure you out or read your mind and meet your desires by intuition. Eros evolves, and in stage two what becomes sexy is each partner showing up, each partner being willing to invest in what makes the other happy. And the way this happens is through clearly communicating what incites your passion (which, of course, you can only do if you have first taken the time to understand yourself and what it is you really desire- which was the first movement in this series of lessons). It feels awkward at first and unromantic, but remember that you are seeking Romance 2.0 now. The older version is passe.  Once again, communication is key. We’d argue that actually scheduling in these talks is super helpful precisely because we have been conditioned to feel awkward about bringing these matters up in conversation. Hack yourself.

 

Onto the third tenet:

Knowing what brings your partner erotic excitement is half the battle and that comes via hard conversations. The other half is following through, showing up, scheduling, planning. Making this aspect of your relationship a priority (or at least to the degree that both of you want it to be). This is again a mark of Stage Two of passion that is almost the opposite of the first stage of infatuation. Early on, everything seemed to happen spontaneously. I love spontaneous. It is okay to grieve the loss of spontaneity as you go about adulting. But the reality for marriage is that you can’t trust the spontaneous. You need to build the passion into the schedule, put it on the calendar. But this doesn’t mean that what you do to meet each other’s desires has to stagnate or become routine. Quite the opposite. Since a part of the erotic is an experience of the unknown, of an adventure and the new, couples keen on eros will likely seek to enjoy their passionate time together in new ways and new places. But this leads us to a common complaint against monogamy- sex with the same person doesn’t scratch that erotic itch for the new. Let’s unpack this a bit here.

 

We are not going to argue that this complaint doesn’t carry some validity. But we totally believe monogamy is the wisest of all arrangements and here is why: (1) the alternatives are over-hyped and short-sighted. Like a mosquito bite, you scratch that itch and it will likely just itch all the more and you keep scratching until you are bleeding.  (2) If couples learned to seek the “new” not in a new person but in the countless other ways that “new” can be introduced, they might find that sex stays very interesting.  In other words, looking for the “new” in a new partner is the lazy route. Or maybe it is a route for people who completely lack imagination. (3) We can also level a challenge to the very claim that sex with the same person gets dull because of the “sameness” of the person involved. As Esther Perel wisely pointed out, it is an illusion to think we as people stay the same or that we ever really come to fully know the person sleeping next to us. In other words, sex will stay much more interesting to the degree you learn to perceive the actual distance that exists between you and your partner. The erotic inhabits those territories of the unknown and so when you learn to hone in on the gap between you and your partner the erotic will be animated. Which leads to our fourth tenet:

 

Practicing lust for our spouses is the most important exercise we can do to build and maintain passion in a marriage. (Again, we will repeat, not everyone is concerned to maintain passion in a marriage, and that is totally fine, but if you are…) Lust is a craving of the mind and especially the imagination, and the art of lusting after your spouse is the psychological trick to recreating a distance between you and your spouse that otherwise collapses as your emotional intimacy grows. And as Perel rightly argued, it is that distance, that synapse, that drives the erotic desire. Here is why this works. When you are lusting you are experiencing second hand, you are imagining what something is or could be, but you are not actually partaking. In other words, you are wanting something you don’t technically “have” in that moment. Remember the driving question- “Can we want something we already have?” When we fantasize about our spouse, we are in real time wanting someone that is not actually in our arms. And if you learn to do this regularly you will discover that no matter how often you get together it will feel like not enough, because by comparison you are spending considerably more of your waking hours in a state of “apartness” which you will be experiencing as a state of unmet desire. This will be your fuel.  

Imaginative lust may look different for women than it does for men. Often times for men lust is driven by a physical attribute of the spouse, whereas with women it can be a more complex set of factors. We’ll provide two examples just to flesh this out a bit. But obviously, the thing that drives your lust will be unique to you and so uncovering what that is for you will be necessary if you are going to apply these tenets.

 

/ the exercise /

Have that awkward conversation about what it is that turns you on. Negotiate. Plan. Schedule your dates.

 

Lesson #38.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Hack yourself:.

Passion has a second stage.

You just need to know the right exercises.

 

What you need is: A Rigorous Training Program for the Imagination

 

/ unpacked /

 

Example 1

 

What attribute do you most desire about your partner?  Physical attributes are part of the equation of eros, but we can be turned on by much more than beautiful eyes. It may be their sassiness, their dancing, their imagination, their style, or simply the fact that he or she is willing to put in the effort. This is especially the case once you have learned to practice communicating what it is that instigates your passion.

 

If you are able to realize how your passion increases when your partner cares and tries and shows up, please learn to flip this script on yourself, realizing you have the responsibility to help turn your partner on.  The one thing you don’t want to do though is spend time evaluating how hard your partner is trying in comparison to you- that will lead to a dead end. We naturally make these comparisons all the time, so the hack is to turn off the comparisons and to learn to focus on yourself, or on what is already present in your spouse that you can appreciate, that you can use to spike your desire.

 

Perhaps what kindles your sexual drive is a combination of factors, such as seeing your husband laugh and play tenderly with the kids and (though these two things seem disparate) having a clean and attractive bedroom. For some reason you’ve found that when these two conditions are met, that is when arousal is highest. If these conditions are articulated to the husband the husband can play an active role in helping his spouse turn her passion on. But as for the wife, her role is to tend to her imagination. If these are the conditions that drive passion, she will want to imagine these conditions to generate that longing, that gap that fuels desire. This will be her fantasy that will prime the pump.

 

/ the exercise /

Take time to journal about the things that most turn you on.

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Lesson #39.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Hack yourself.

Passion has a second stage.

You just need to know the right exercises.

 

What you need is: A Rigorous Training Program for the Imagination

 

/ unpacked /

 

Example 2:

 

One heuristic to keep in mind is that the fantasy you construct around your spouse needs to be loosely tethered to reality. The beauty of the imagination is that it knows no bounds, but that can also be its curse. What you want is to employ it judiciously. Here is an example. Say your spouse has a nice butt. It’s not too small. It’s not as big as you’d like it be, but it is a source of pleasure to you. As you have learned that the key to passion in stage 2 is good and clear communication, it comes up that you love her butt and you feel embolden to ask if she’d be willing to eat some more peanut butter M&Ms and do hip thrusts to increase that booty from 38” circumference to 42” and maybe achieving thicker thighs as a bonus. Note that you don’t ask or expect her to get her butt up to 56”-as much as that would be even more awesome to you- because you want your imagination to be tethered to her and realistically she has a given set of genes that dictate how big of booty is possible. Your imagination training program now is to appreciate the butt she has, to be incredibly grateful it is 38” and not 32”, and to think the thoughts that will generate lust and appreciation for what she already has (that could be particular thongs or twerking or whatever- you get the picture). And if through clear communication she agrees to work on adding a few inches, this can be a huge boost psychologically. If we can learn to receive such suggestions and act on them we not only become sexier to our partner in the way they articulated turns them on, but the very fact that we took them seriously and followed through demonstrates something deeper- our love for them and willingness to go the extra mile- and this interjects a special attractive power of its own. The win is doubled. A couple caveats at this point. First, there has to be genuine buy-in from both partners, if one spouse feels truly uncomfortable or does something begrudgingly it would be better if they didn’t do it all. Second, many of us have taken upon ourselves a public persona that acts as if it doesn’t care about physical appearance. None of us wants to be like that guy who is “trying too hard.”  In many circles “trying” at all (to care about or improve your appearance) means you must have low self-esteem and body image issues. I sometimes wonder how many people are intentionally not trying as just another way to fit in and avoid being judged. It would be so much better if we all got to the place where we could all just admit that we do care what others think about us- and probably too much- and we could give each other grace in our collective insecurity. A better approach might be to let ourselves care but to focus on looking our best for our spouse versus those present at an office meeting. Direct that energy towards the person who matters the most. Seek their opinion and approval.

 

  

/ the exercise /

Take time to listen to what turns your spouse on.

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

Lesson #40.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Make sure some of your systems have purpose built into them.

 

Make sure some of your systems have some fun built into them.

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

Make sure some of your systems have purpose built into them.

Your shared purpose may evolve and change during different seasons of the life and marriage, but finding shared purpose is hugely indicative of marital happiness.  Child rearing is a common one, but don’t let that become the sole purpose or you’ll be left feeling empty when they leave the house. We know a million people have said that and maybe it sounds cliché now, but there is a reason it keeps getting repeated, it’s because people falling into this same trap. Neglecting children to pursue a career or other ambitions is clearly selfish and harmful, but making children the center of everything all the time isn’t doing anyone a favor either. Figure out what a healthy balance looks like for your family.

 

Make sure some of your systems have some fun built into them.

Balance. Once again. Don’t seek perfect balance because there is no such thing. But pay heed to the creation of some balance. Life can be heavy because it is heavy. Adulting is no joke. But bringing some humor and learning to still find time to play is so necessary!  We’ll return to this in a future lesson.

 

 

/ the exercise /

Name not just one, but multiple purposes your marriage serves. What do you both care about and what are you doing together that matters?

 

 

 

Transitioning into the fourth movement: Community Integrator

 

Lesson #41.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Remember that it takes a village not just to raise a child, but to support a healthy marriage.

 

/ unpacked /

 

In countless ways the world has become more interconnected than ever before. It comes as a tragic irony then that at the same time people are experiencing more isolation and loneliness than ever before.

 

 

/ the exercise /  

Spend some time evaluating how integrated your on-line community is with your in-person community. Compare the support you get from each.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson #42.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Ask yourself: “are our friends and family helping our marriage thrive?” (And conversely, is our marriage a force for good in their lives?)

 

/ unpacked /

 

As mentioned earlier, sometimes the quickest way to make a big impact on your life is to subtract a habit, an influence, a person, or situation from the equation. Everyone is toxic in their own way and everyone needs grace. The thing is, we do ourselves and others a favor when we come to learn where we are called to give grace and where we are called to move on and let someone else dispense that grace.

 

Often times we fall into particular behavioral patterns around particular people. We can be as much to blame as the other person. But if we know we are too weak to get out of that rut, then maybe the wisest way forward is to remove yourself from that relationship. Don’t put yourself in a situation where you know you are likely to make a bad choice or continue a bad habit or nurture a side of your character you ultimately don’t want to nurture. This is not easy, but there are times when we should end friendships or acquaintances in order to help us be better human beings and better spouses.

 

There are likely many folks who don’t feel they have any toxic friendships but perhaps have so many shallow friendships that their calendars are bursting at the seams. Maybe your problem is that you are spread too thin, taking on too many relationships and the result is that you can’t invest enough quality time in the ones that matter most. This too can be a detriment in our efforts to build a healthy marriage. Consider your situation.

 

/ the exercise /

Ask yourself: “are our friends and family helping our marriage thrive?” (And conversely, is our marriage a force for good in their lives?)

 

 

 

Lesson #43.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Have healthy friendships that fulfill some relational needs in ways that your spouse can’t.

 

/ unpacked /

 

In his book The Four Loves, CS Lewis has this brilliant section on friendship. He shares how friendship comes about when we meet people who share a similar appreciation for something in this world. We discover a common insight, interest or taste and we think “What? You too? I thought I was the only one?” While a spouse is ideally your best friend, a spouse is also a lover and that relationship has dynamics that are quite different from those of a friendship. Lewis writes:

 

“Lovers are normally face to face, absorbed in each other; Friends, side by side, absorbed in some common interest. Above all, Eros (while it lasts) is necessarily between two only. But two, far from being the necessary number for Friendship, is not even the best. And the reason for this is important. Lamb says somewhere that if, of three friends (A, B, and C), A should die, then B loses not only A but “A’s part in C,” while C loses not only A but “A’s part in B.” In each of my friends there is something that only some other friend can fully bring out. By myself I am not large enough to call the whole man into activity; I want other lights than my own to show all his facets. Now that Charles is dead, I shall never again see Ronald’s reaction to a specifically Caroline joke. Far from having more of Ronald, having him “to myself” now that Charles is away, I have less of Ronald…Two friends delight to be joined by a third, and three by a fourth, if only the newcomer is qualified to become a real friend.”

 

When we lived in Holland we had 17 housemates over the course of 12 years. One of the truly beautiful things about this was that diverse parts of us, interests that we as a couple didn’t perhaps share- found outlets for expression and affirmation amongst these housemates through the friendships that naturally arose out of proximity. We obviously had more in common with some housemates than others, but the range of their interests permitted fuller expressions or versions of ourselves to be experienced and lived. We realize that in an unhealthy marriage the presence of housemates does the carry the potential to exacerbate the situation and further a divide, but if your marriage is solid we found these relationships to relieve some of the pressure our modern society puts on marriage. As a society we too often act like your marriage partner has to be this perfect fit, someone who gets you 100% all of the time. Someone who shares all your interests and passions. And we believe that is not only ridiculous but impossible. Other friendships are such a gift because they scratch our itch to be around people who love the things we love, who share some of our weird obsessions, who like the same music or find joy playing the same sport.

 

Two further thoughts on this matter. First, studies suggest that we are in a friendship recession. We talked about that in an earlier lesson. Studies also report that women tend to be better at maintaining these types of friendships than men. We want to pause here and lament all this. We believe this trend is tragic for all of us, as individuals, and as couples. We might not necessarily “need” friends, but life is so much richer with them.

Second, not only are we of the belief that Americans need more friends, but we would go much farther and argue that we need committed friendships. Wesley Hill, a celibate gay Christian, wrote a phenomenal book titled “Spiritual friendship” that reveals the deeply problematic and underdeveloped notions of friendship that dominate our culture.

For instance, he argues that as a culture we reserve deep levels of commitment only for romantic love and in doing so we have undermined and limited the significance of  friendships in our lives. Friendships could be esteemed higher and we could create levels of more explicit commitment to them, we could even prioritize dear friends over careers, opting to stay in one location because community trumps an increase in status and a higher paying job. Imagine what life would be like if we could learn to declare our friendships publicly? Again, we are suggesting that many of our cultural narratives be questioned.

 

 

/ the exercise /

 

Read Together: The Healing Power of Human Connection in a Sometimes Lonely World, by Vivek H. Murthy, MD (US Surgeon General)

 

Or, for people in faith traditions, read Spiritual Friendship, by Wesley Hill

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson #44.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Have couples friends too.

 

/ unpacked /

 

This is not an either/or, but a both/and.

You want to have friends that speak to your idiosyncrasies and interests. You want to have a marriage where you bless your spouse to hang out with her friends and she permits you to hang out with your friends. But you also want other couples that both of you enjoy being around. Couples friends. Couples you both know and like.

 

Why?

A marriage relationship is complex and if we go at it alone and isolated, we are more likely to fall into a distorted perspective of our own relationship. We generally benefit from seeing how other couples behave around each other. We can benefit from hearing their struggles and witnessing their successes. We realize that while yes, my partner is difficult in this and that way, if I would have married someone else I would have an entire different set of problems. When we spend enough time around other couples we gain perspective. We realize no one is immune to the stress of marriaging. Equally important, if the relationships gain any depth, you start to become more vulnerable with each other. You grant others more access. You become more transparent. Or perhaps you are just around each other so much that you accidently reveal more of your true self, and in the process these friends start to really know you and know how you and your spouse interact. When we become closer with other couples we open ourselves and our marriage relationship up to receive helpful feedback and counsel. When we are not hiding things, when they are brought out into the open, then there is the real possibility that those who love us may provide support.

 

 

/ the exercise /

Read The Art of Gathering, by Priya Parker

 

 

Lesson #45.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Don’t raise your children alone.  We all need help.

 

/ unpacked /

 

If you have children, you know that much of your marital relationship revolves around these needy human beings. Whenever I talk to young married couples who don’t have children I feel like I just have to give this counsel, even though if someone would have given it to me it would not have made a difference because there are things we can’t know until we have experienced them. Having children is definitely one of those things. I tell these young couples: 1st…The moment you have a child, know that you have entered an 18 year prison sentence. You have lost any remaining freedom for what will likely be your busiest season of life…. (I pause here and look at them with my most serious face to convey a sense of fear and trembling)…Don’t enter this lightly, I advise. Then I say this, 2nd… There is no way to be totally “ready” to have children and they don’t come with an instruction manual, nevertheless, if you feel called to have children, it is absolutely the truth that you won’t regret it and that these very same people who frustrate you and enslave you will also steal your heart. Even before they can say they love you, you will be willing to die for them.

 

While I realize there are exceptions, rare parents who lack the parental instinct, the reality for most people is that your children occupy a special place in your heart. It will be easier to be patient with and demonstrate a self-less love towards your child than it will be to give the same love towards your spouse. As a parent you do all kinds of loving things for your children regardless of their behavior. You practice a beautiful kind of self-giving love. And what most of us don’t realize is that the more we are loving towards someone, the more we tend to feel loving towards that person. With our spouse we tend to think “you are a grown up, act like one.” We don’t give our spouse much grace. We harbor expectations. Our affection is often conditional. This is something to be aware of and guard against. We guard against this when we learn how necessary grace and forgiveness is to our marriage. And we guard against this when chose to intentionally invest in our marriage because we know that loving our spouse may not come as natural as loving our children.

 

While there are cultural (or sub-cultures) exceptions to this trend, across the United States many family units are no longer organized around the parents’ careers but around what is best for the children. We have rightfully demonized that success-driven parent who puts their career above their child but often the pendulum has swung too far in the opposite direction. Now we are more prone to obsess about giving our child every opportunity to succeed and experience life that we can’t say no to a traveling soccer team or a third extracurricular activity. It is like our children are experiencing our FOMO vicariously.

 

Hopefully we’ll achieve some balance in the future. Hopefully we can move beyond parent-centered and child-centered homes to homes that balance the welfare of everyone under the roof. Families where adults put each other and their children above the accumulation of money and status, where they are invested in their marriage for the long haul while carving out sufficient time to sow affection into the lives of their children. In this scenario children receive plenty of attention but can witness that their parents also have a life and a loving relationship of their own. Children get to see firsthand what it looks like for adults to invest in each other and put the work into a relationship. When the children leave the home, the parents relationship doesn’t dissolve, it evolves into its next season. This is a tough balancing act. We all fail. But are we willing to keep striving for this?

 

In the past parents had the support of grandparents, aunts, uncles, neighbors and friends in the rearing of children. Imagine a live-in babysitter. Sound Beverly Hills boujee? Well, around the clock childcare continues to be a reality for people world-wide below the poverty line who come from collectivist, strong-group societies. There are still many people who live together  in extended family units or in tribal structures that share the supervision and instruction of children. While most people in the West consider this a  backwards way of living it may someday turn out to be considered the most progressive way forward. But we are not going to argue for that here. It is a huge conversation and there are pros and cons on each side. We are inserting it into the conversation here because although we are white westerners who hail from individualistic family structures, we have been privileged to witness neighbors from other cultures do this family thing very differently and really opened our eyes. There are other ways to live this life. So we simply invite you to consider that between the these two extremes- the western, individualistic model of parenting alone, and the eastern, traditional model of a village raising a child- there lies a continuum. And what would it look like to become more dependent on family and friends in the raising of your children?

 

 

/ the exercise /

 

What are ways you can enlist the help of others to raise your children and what are ways you can help other parents raise their children?

  

For Christians:

Read When the Church was a Family, by Joseph Hellerman and Called to Community: the life Jesus wants for his people

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson #46.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Keep playing. Or, relearn how to play.

 

/ unpacked /

 

This is an email we crafted and sent out to a group of friends. If this is inspiring or helpful feel free to steal it or adapt it for your own purposes. Copy & paste 

 

 

Good evening! 

 

Melissa and I are not going through a midlife crisis, but we have engaged in a whole lot of mid-life reflection over this past year. We had a surfeit of time last winter which only further stimulated our desire to subtract more busyness from our lives in order to open up more time for that which we find life-giving.

 

Lifestyle design sounds and can be boujee and we confess to digesting too much Tim Ferriss this past year. Nevertheless, it seems like obvious wisdom to align what you are doing in life with what you believe in and therefore want to be doing. With this in mind we have set up a number of systems or habits that prioritize time with our children, time with each other (weekly date nights), time with the body of Christ, time to exercise, time in Scripture, time that is completely unscheduled and open, etc. Simplifying life is not a simple endeavor, and there remains much that still feels like meaningless busy work. However, we continue to be amazed by how much of the busyness can be taken off the table if we are courageous enough to challenge society’s script for our lives. That is a separate conversation from this letter but a topic we are budding evangelists for.

 

This letter is the result of Melissa and I asking ourselves, what do we most want to add to our lives in this season of life? We came up with two things. One of which is the subject of this letter, which is “fun.” More specifically, play.

 

For those of you who know Jon and Necia, you know they quite publicly have “Work hard, Play hard” as their mantra and do a good job of living into that. Melissa and I are not sure that we have as much energy as they do and we keep saying our mantra would be “work hard, rest hard, play hard.”  The first we have always been great at, the second we are now doing quite well, but the third remains an area for growth. We are taking up some personal hobbies but Melissa and I both are the types that experience the most fun in a group setting. So we got to brainstorming…how do we find a group of adults who just want to have more fun? This seemed like an easy question at first glance, but the more we thought about it we realized that adults don’t engage in much that is playful. The demands of adulting naturally atrophy our imaginations and play muscles.

 

There is of course more to the question. For starters, people have very different ideas of what constitutes fun. Fun could be retiring every evening to Netflix or some alcohol. Maybe it is gaming or a sport. The possibilities are endless. When Melissa and I contemplated this more we came to realize that what we desired was not so much a particular activity that we deemed “fun,” as much as a posture and pursuit of doing new things to stretch ourselves and inject some playful mystery and novelty into life. New fun, new adventures, maybe some travel. What I mean by that is that we didn’t just want to join a swing dance club, we want to try all kinds of new things. Things we wouldn’t normally do- like bubble football, a paint and sip class, a virtual gaming night, a Halloween costume party, chartering a sail boat, etc.

 

Then we started having conversations about who would do this kind of stuff with us and how would we go about organizing it. Thankfully we had just read the perfect pair of books to answer these questions- The Art of Gathering, by Priya Parker  and  The Power of Fun: How to feel alive again, by Catherine Price. From these books we felt assured that structure is a must. If we sat back and wished for a group of like-minded folks to organically or magically appear we could be waiting for a long time. Life is chaotic for people. We live in a culture where married people, especially married people with children, almost never do things spontaneously. For better or worse, play, like everything else, needs to be put on the calendar for it to come to pass.

 

So this is the invitation:

Would you like to join a club to keep yourself accountable to playing more? We read that when naming events or clubs that specificity is helpful, so how is this for the name- “Married couples needing regular doses of fun club”?

 

Some potential club rules…

1.    I will bring my spirit of adventure with me, ready to try new things, and contribute to a positive group energy even amidst a diversity of opinions.

2.    We will come to at least 8 of the 11 yearly outings. Outings will take place on the ______ (TBD) of each month, unless otherwise determined.

3.    I will turn my phone off and be present.

4.    I will lean into the principles of two cornerstone books for this group: The Art of Gathering, by Priya Parker  &  The Power of Fun: How to feel alive again, by Catherine Price.

 

Now the sticky and awkward part. We made a couple of lists of friends to invite. Congratulations, you all were on our first list J. Priya Parker recommends a group size of roughly 12 so we are hoping there will be 5 couples who feel a similar ache and drive to schedule in more play. If we can’t get 5 from our first list we’ll start reaching out to the second. The main thing we want to say though is that there is absolutely no pressure whatsoever to join and we will in no way feel hurt if you decline. The very last thing we want is to put any pressure on anyone to join something that is going to add more stress or busyness to life. What is life-giving to one couple may be a burden to another. Or maybe the timing isn’t right for you. All of our circumstances are different, so we don’t pretend to know what would be healthy for any of you. This is merely an invitation. If it doesn’t fit, don’t wear it.

 

When we started a book club in 2017 we invited some of our closest friends and most of them couldn’t commit and instead a hodgepodge of other friends / acquaintances ended up coming. Looking back I wouldn’t trade out these people for the world- it was the perfect group and it continues on to this day and we love it! We trust people to discern for themselves what makes the most sense and God has a way of orchestrating it from there. That all being said, we didn’t put a million people on this list because realistically this kind of group would fail if it was too large. There are many friends we didn’t send this out to and that was difficult but logistically unavoidable. So we ask for your discretion and we hope we won’t be offending anyone. Another thing to note, we love single people and in so many ways seek to embody a radical inclusiveness, yet we acknowledge that this space, this group, is serving a different purpose. We’ve wrestled with this too, but in the end feel that there can be times and places for those in similar stages and circumstances to gather with intentionality and that is okay.

 

Talk this over with your spouse and let us know your thoughts by October 5th.  We have a few more thoughts on how to democratically determine the groups’ outings and adventures but this is already a crazy long email. And please do note, we are very, very open to suggestions and your brainstorming. Thanks for taking the time to read this!

 

Cheers!

 

/ the exercise /

 

Do you feel like you have enough places and spaces for play in your life? Discuss this with your spouse. If you desire more fun, make a plan to implement it!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson #47.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Find your “third spaces” – places beyond work and home where we interact freely and casually in our communities.

 

 

/ unpacked /

 

You have probably heard about the “blue zones,” a handful of places in the world renowned for how long their residents live. When researchers tried to isolate what was unique among these people that accounted for their long life several things surfaced. Interestingly, chief among these was their social connection. These people had a sense of belonging and purpose. They got out and did things with others. They had a reason to get out of bed in the morning. Even more important than a healthy diet was healthy amount of human interaction.

 

Why is this being brought up in curriculum on marriage? Your involvement in a community matters. Social integration is a predictor not just of physical heath, but mental and emotional health. And you want to bring the healthiest version of yourself possible into your marriage. So we are circling back to where we started, acknowledging that I am who I am because of who we are.

  

/ the exercise /

 

Check out the TED talk “The secret to living longer may be your social life” by Susan Pinker 

 

 

 

 

Lesson #48.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Seek love over money, status, career, and achievements.

 

/ unpacked /

 

This is unbelievably cliché. So why even say it? We repeat it here because despite the tidal wave of novels and films and self-help publications all screaming it, we seem to have a propensity to get our priorities mixed up. Knowing this about ourselves, there are some messages that we need continual reminders of.  This is one of those messages.

 

It may be helpful to expand our understanding of wealth. Ethan Roland developed a more holistic model for understanding wealth in the service of building resilience. He described 8 forms of capital: intellectual, spiritual, social, material, financial, living, cultural, and experiential. He didn’t put them into a hierarchy, and as a result we feel like it serves as a corrective for our near exclusive obsession with financial capital. Love is a form of wealth that is spiritual, social, living and experiential. To love and to be loved is a kind of profound wealth giving us more access into realizing our purpose than any amount of money.

 

 

/ the exercise /

Spend 10 minutes contemplating your funeral. Write down what you hope people will say.

 

  

 

 

 

 

Lesson #49.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Grace is the glue that holds the good life together.

 

/ unpacked /

 

What makes up the good life? Is it life being good to you? Is it you being good to life? Is it some combination of these?

 

Throughout this curriculum we have encouraged you to work this question out. You may come to a very different answer than us, or a different answer from the one your parents believed. What you don’t want is to never ask the question or seek for answers.

 

Find a formula that makes sense to you. Writer Anne Lamott devised a simple sentence to capture what she felt were the 3 truths of our existence- “that we are so ruined, and so loved, and in charge of so little.” For me, seeing the world through the lens of paradox is a necessity. What is it for you?

 

Whatever it is, we hope you come to experience grace. We believe in striving for excellence, in self-knowledge that leads to self-improvement, in becoming the best version of yourself for not only yourself, but for your spouse and others. But we all have weaknesses. Even worse, we all have a shadow side. Even if the good life arrives at our front door step we will be prone to mess it up. In the end grace is what is necessary to hold the good life together. Grace for each other. Grace for ourselves.

 

 

/ the exercise /

Make grace not just a part of your vocabulary and outlook on life, but the glue that holds life together.

 

 

 

 

Lesson #50.

 

/ in a nutshell /

 

Marriaging is a journey. Enjoy the journey.

 

/ unpacked /

 

The end game is the present moment.

 

Yes, it is also the future…the vision of you and your spouse huddled together in tender love at a ripe old age, able to look back at a life well lived. But the end is achieved through the present. We must live in the present moment. Be the people we want to be now. What you do now casts a vote for who you are both now and who you will become in the future. Stay in the game. Make the most of now.

 

/ the exercise /

Marriages evolve because life is never static. You grow and change. So does your partner. These units are presented in a circular graphic to reflect the fact the marriaging well is a never ending process. The systems you put in place last year may need to be updated. Your partner’s hopes and dreams will change course, perhaps only a little, or perhaps a lot. Healthy marriages are built not just on kind communication, but consistent communication. Together, you course correct along life’s way. Keep returning to each other in love and intentionality.